User talk:Markhoris

The Open Door

Regarding this reversion, no problem with that, but look at what the citation is sourcing...says that it was released in Colombia in October 2007. Obviously this is a problem...it must actually be October 2006, which means the date for the citation should be October 18, 2006. Heading to sleep now, but look forward to your thoughts. — Huntster (t @ c) 12:21, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

I actually think that October 18, 2007 is the exact day the Weight of the World single was released. If you look at this, EvThreads.com first discussed this on October 18, 2007. This is weird since the source has been around since at least May 15, 2007. --Markhoris (talk) 11:16, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Stranger and stranger. I honestly don't know how to best reconcile this issue. I wonder if there wasn't an error with the archiving service that's presenting an incorrect date...seems unlikely, but unless the source was vastly prescient...I dunno. — Huntster (t @ c) 13:51, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Work Bitch

A reference I added from Examiner.com was removed with it cited as 'unreliable', but another quote under the Critical Reception section added by another user references the same website to source information. Is there a reason why my citation was removed but the other is allowed to be used? User5482 (talk) 19:43, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

I didn't notice that, thanks for pointing it out to me. By the way, the reason Examiner.com is unreliable is because it accepts articles from anyone with limited or no editorial oversight. There is a reason the URL is on the blacklist. --Markhoris (talk) 04:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Work Bitch

The producers that are mostly mentioned to have produced the song are will.i.am and Anthony Preston. http://rock.rapgenius.com/Britney-spears-work-bitch-lyrics#note-2209338 http://www.directlyrics.com/britney-spears-werk-bitch-lyrics.html http://muzicjunkie.com/reviews/britney-spears-work-bitch-new-single/ Other than that I think we should wait until the album is released so we can see the production credits.

Britney Jean

Sorry for the confusion. The issue I was trying to point out (mostly) was that none of the sources provided showed a digital download release, only CD. — Status (talk · contribs) 16:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Perfume

I had a reliable source but as usual it got edited and deleted again. I'm a Britney fan so I really follow what she's doing and all the news related to her so I do know stuff, and when I got to add that stuff on wiki pages like the Perfume one it gets deleted as if all the things I edited are irrelevant to some people which happen to have some'authority' over those pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Westernassisin (talk • contribs) 08:27, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Are you talking about a source for Keith Harris being a producer and Chris Braide being a writer for "Perfume"? If there is a reliable source for that, can you provide it? I don't recall there being one. --Markhoris (talk) 12:23, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

I have represented Chris Braide, Braide Productions Inc, for the past 10 years for all of his digital releases as an artist, and together with himself and his management - McDaniel Entertainment and his publisher SONY BMG/Chrysalis try to ensure all of his work as an artist/writer and producer is represented accurately and clearly. I can confirm that Chris Braide and Sia Furler wrote this song together with some lyrical additions by Britney Spears. RCA will confirm this. Agentwilde (talk) 15:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi Markhoris - We don't wish to be unreasonable only to state the facts, however you have a better understanding of what is required in wiki than we do. Just to reiterate Chris Braide and Sia Furler wrote Perfume together, Chris produced the track - the one released as a single he did the vocal production only, The Dreaming Mix, which will be available on the deluxe version is all his production. I have just discussed all of this with Chris, we will leave it until the album comes out with all the credits. Thanks Agentwilde (talk) 16:41, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Britney Jean Japan bonus track lengths

I don't know how to source the lengths of a remix, but the remixes were sent them out to radio and I have tried to fill in the lengths of those two remixes. Work Bitch (The Jane Doze Remix) - 2:58, Work Bitch (7th Heaven Club Mix) - 7:07. Gcampbell92 (talk) 16:41, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Amy Lee + reflinks

Hi Markhoris
Just wanted to say thanks for reverting me on Amy Lee, I hadn't even realized Reflinks made it 10x worse so thanks!,
Very much appreciated :)
Regards, →Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 13:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Perfume

Hi I'm the one who is has been editing the "Perfume" song page by adding the title in the next single area with "All The Way 2014" but I don't know how to posts links/references but if you need proof here: http://www.mstarz.com/articles/32680/20140626/britney-spears-new-song-coming-this-summer-single-titled-all-the-way-to-be-released-this-august.htm

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.203.121.232 (talk) 11:03, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pillars of Eternity

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pillars of Eternity you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 15:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pillars of Eternity

The article Pillars of Eternity you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pillars of Eternity for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 10:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pillars of Eternity

The article Pillars of Eternity you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pillars of Eternity for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 14:41, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Pillars of Eternity

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of That Bass Tour

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article That Bass Tour you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 09:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of That Bass Tour

The article That Bass Tour you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:That Bass Tour for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 19:21, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of That Bass Tour

The article That Bass Tour you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:That Bass Tour for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Calvin999 -- Calvin999 (talk) 20:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar for You!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring That Bass Tour to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work!  — Calvin999 20:46, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II – The Sith Lords

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II – The Sith Lords you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 16:00, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

KotOR II

A few days ago, I looked at the Sith Lords article, an article in need of severe expansion. It was a nice surprise, then, to see it suddenly nominated as a Good Article a few days later. Nice work, and good luck with it. – The Millionth One (talk) (contribs) 15:30, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

The Millionth One, thank you for the kind words. Expanding the article was pretty hard, and hopefully I will bring it to Good Article status. You did a great job on the Kreia article too. --Markhoris (talk) 15:52, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II – The Sith Lords

The article Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II – The Sith Lords you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II – The Sith Lords for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 06:40, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II – The Sith Lords

The article Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II – The Sith Lords you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic II – The Sith Lords for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AdrianGamer -- AdrianGamer (talk) 12:01, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Chase (talk | contributions) 19:09, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Meghan Trainor discography

• They don't use Japanese peak chart positions because Japan Hot 100 was established in 2008. So the singles which were released before 2008 didn't have chart positions on that chart. If they want to use Japanese peaks for singles, they have to refer to Oricon Singles Chart. Like Avril Lavigne discography.
• The size of the music market has been a widely used policy. The former editor of Meghan Trainor discography also used this policy to select country which can be shown on the table. See THIS.
• There are also many discography using another country's peaks instead of Ireland ones though the artist gets higher peaks in IRE. See Lady Gaga discography, Katy Perry discography and Lana Del Rey discography. This has been discussed many times on the talk page. Please click and see.
• Trainor doesn't get bad grades in Japan. There are three songs charted on Japan Hot 100, and one song was a top ten hit. Trainor also went to Japan many times to promote her album and singles. See All About That Bass Live, Interview and Live at SMAP X SMAP in Japan. Japan is one of her important markets. Did she also do that in Ireland?
• "Higher peaks don't really mean anything, since it is much easier to get those peaks in Ireland, since the market is so small."
• If you think we have to show more certifications on discography. Why don't you change Netherlands into Denmark or Italy?
  • Denmark: Platinum + Gold
  • Italy: 2× Platinum + Gold
  • Netherlands: None
• "All About That Bass" was certified triple platinum in Sweden, double platinum in Spain.
• "The first certification listed per work should be the award for the artist's home country, followed by the rest of the awards earned, listed alphabetically by provider." The WikiProject you link to says so.
• You just came along and reverted a bunch of edits and did not give the reason (you didn't like them). Don't change the image I put. It's the latest and clearest.

Nine reasons —U990467(talk) 17:13, 23 August 2015‎ (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

You have been invited to join the Meghan Trainor WikiProject, a WikiProject on the English Wikipedia dedicated to improving articles and lists related to Meghan Trainor. If you are interested in joining, please visit the project page and add your name to the list of participants. Thank You.

List of Neverwinter Nights characters

Hi Markhoris,

Concerning List of Neverwinter Nights characters, articles actually do need to be properly sourced, and not by its primary sources, i.e., the video game where the character is from. I should've pointed to the guideline WP:GAMETRIVIA No. 6. I've nominated the list of deletion though, as I can find any reliable sources on the characters. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 16:00, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Britney Spears

I agree with you that that particular picture should not be used. I've warned the other editor for edit warring and suggested that her or she raise it on the article's talk page. Meters (talk) 22:57, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

Britney Spears lead image

In regards to your edit summaries, I wasn't merely referring to edits I made on her specific page, but rather edits on related pages, such as Glory (Britney Spears album), which I have made significant contributions to. I've opened up a discussion about the image on the Britney Spears talk page so a consensus can be reached. Thank you. Traveltoromantis (talk) 23:05, 26 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Markhoris. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Markhoris. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Markhoris. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Weight of the World (Evanescence song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Weight of the World (Evanescence song), to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weight of the World (Evanescence song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 28 May 2023 (UTC)