Talk:Testery

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

Military history: British / European / World War II Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Cryptography: Computer science

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.

TUNNY or Tunny?

The General report on Tunny (Good, Jack; Michie, Donald; Timms, Geoffrey (1945), General Report on Tunny: With Emphasis on Statistical Methods, UK Public Record Office HW 25/4 and HW 25/5, retrieved 15 September 2010) does not use TUNNY. What then is the justification for the anonymous editor to insist on 'TUNNY'? This is contrary to WP:ALLCAPS --TedColes (talk) 07:44, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Denis Oswald NOT the IOC version

I have removed links to Denis Oswald (IOC) before and have done so again, after the links were added back in. Note that Denis Oswald (IOC) was born in 1947 and so could not have possibly worked at the Testery in Bletchley Park during the Second World War, ending in 1945. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.79.203.43 (talk) 05:32, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Date established

The General report on Tunny, Jerry Roberts' chapter in Jack Copeland's 'Colossus' and other sources say that the Testery was founded in July 1942. An anonymous editor at 86.157.13.186 disputes this, but, as yet, has not cited sources or used this discussion page to justify a different view. There are a number of other matters, including using 'TUNNY' instead of 'Tunny' that (s)he insists on without justification. The recent deletion of the 'Bibliography' section does not make the main text any more valid. I do think that this editor should consult the following as well as Wikipedia guidelines on overlinking WP:OVERLINK

Good, Jack; Michie, Donald; Timms, Geoffrey (1945), General Report on Tunny: With Emphasis on Statistical Methods, UK Public Record Office HW 25/4 and HW 25/5, retrieved 15 September 2010 That version is a facsimile copy, but there is a transcript of much of this document in '.pdf' format at: Sale, Tony (2001), Part of the "General Report on Tunny", the Newmanry History, formatted by Tony Sale (PDF), retrieved 20 September 2010, and a web transcript of Part 1 at: Ellsbury, Graham, General Report on Tunny With Emphasis on Statistical Methods, retrieved 3 November 2010

Roberts, Jerry (2006), "Major Tester's Section: The significance of breaking Tunny", in Copeland, B. Jack (ed.), Colossus: The Secrets of Bletchley Park's Codebreaking Computers, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 249–259, ISBN 978-0-19-284055-4
Gannon, Paul (2006), Colossus: Bletchley Park's Greatest Secret, London: Atlantic Books, ISBN 978-1-84354-331-2

--TedColes (talk) 09:58, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

colonel testers section report

as of printing in 2006, Donald Michie mentions on page 246 of copelands colossus that there is a separate report on the testery. he writes that it is still classified. now, we are 17 years later, is the name of this report know, maybe declassified? 46.15.69.163 (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know, this report is still classified.--TedColes (talk) 16:49, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]