Talk:Telecom Armenia

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Armenia

	Telecom Armenia is within the scope of WikiProject Armenia, an attempt to improve and better organize information in articles related or pertaining to Armenia and Armenians. If you would like to contribute or collaborate, you could edit the article attached to this page or visit the project page for further information.ArmeniaWikipedia:WikiProject ArmeniaTemplate:WikiProject ArmeniaArmenian articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Telecommunications

	Telecommunication portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Telecommunications, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Telecommunications on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TelecommunicationsWikipedia:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTemplate:WikiProject TelecommunicationsTelecommunications articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 10 November 2017

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. No prejudice against a future RM with "Veon Armenia" or similar as a proposed title, but clearly there is a consensus against this proposal. Jenks24 (talk) 10:28, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Armenia Telephone Company → «VEON Armenia» CJSC – the company changed it's name to «VEON Armenia» CJSC in October 2017 Marinaddd (talk) 11:31, 10 November 2017 (UTC) --Relisting. — Amakuru (talk) 12:57, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per pretty much everything. This is not WP:RECOGNIZABLE, it violates MOS:TM by including extraneous typographic decoration, it's against MOS:CAPS, WP:NCCAPS, MOS:ACRO, and MOS:TM again in using ATTENTION CAPS on a name that is not an acronym, and is against MOS:TM yet again by unnecessarily including a corporation-type designation at the end. Support Alternative, for now: Veon Armenia. And move VEON to Veon (company) per MOS:CAPS, WP:NCCAPS, MOS:ACRO, and MOS:TM (and numerous precedents, most obviously Sony versus "SONY"). Veon is not an acronym, the capitalization is just marketing stylization, and reliable sources do not consistently capitalize it [1]. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 18:57, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose WP:AT using special characters for no reason. WP:TM using special styling for bad reasons. -- 70.51.45.76 (talk) 04:39, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

As it's been relisted, some things to consider.

The original rationale is invalid, relying on the official name (as is unfortunately common... it would save a lot of time if we could somehow reduce the number of these). There's no support for other reasons, but no other reason is needed IMO.

The suggested alternative name Veon Armenia again seems based on the recent change of official name rather than on any evidence, guideline or policy.

On the positive side there's a heads-up at talk:VEON which now makes this a valid if messy multi-move.

I note that this would reverse and overwrite a previous but recent undiscussed move, the third such:

16:31, 28 February 2017‎ Denis.arnaud (talk | contribs | block)‎ m . . (2,775 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Denis.arnaud moved page Talk:VimpelCom Ltd. to Talk:VEON Ltd.: Official rebranding of the company, as of 27-FEB-2017)
22:56, 6 March 2017‎ ViperSnake151 (talk | contribs | block)‎ m . . (2,775 bytes) (0)‎ . . (ViperSnake151 moved page Talk:VEON Ltd. to Talk:Veon (company): proper capitalization and disambig)
08:09, 26 October 2017‎ Störm (talk | contribs | block)‎ m . . (2,775 bytes) (0)‎ . . (Störm moved page Talk:Veon (company) to Talk:VEON: official name per most sources https://tribune.com.pk/story/1529225/veon-officially-launches-pakistan/)

so it would be good to resolve this. (Those are from the talk page history of course, the moves in the article history are not surprisingly identical.) Andrewa (talk) 13:36, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Veon (company) would seem to be the one to use. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ< 04:45, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(Corrected stringing, I hope that's OK.)

Agree that Veon (company) is the best name for the article currently at VEON. It currently redirects there following one of the moves noted above.

That leaves the question of the best name for the article on the subsidiary also known as the Armenia Telephone Company. Andrewa (talk) 20:26, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Removal of Controversy Section

Hello everyone, I would like to propose the removal of the "Controversy" section in the article about Beeline Armenia's acquisition by TEAM LLC. As of now, the transaction has been successfully completed, and the previously mentioned legal disputes and controversies are no longer relevant. This section may lead to confusion among readers, as it suggests ongoing issues when, in fact, the situation has been resolved. The completion of the transaction has been confirmed by both parties involved, and there have been no recent developments indicating any further disputes or legal challenges. As such, the presence of this section could misrepresent the current state of affairs and is not reflective of the current reality. For accuracy and clarity, I suggest we remove this section to ensure the article provides up-to-date information. Please let me know your thoughts on this matter, and if there are no objections, I will proceed with the removal. Thank you for considering this proposal.

URL https://www.veon.com/newsroom/press-releases/veon-announces-sale-of-armenian-operations

https://hetq.am/en/article/123709

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/VEON-LTD-34473559/news/Team-LLC-completed-the-acquisition-of-VEON-Armenia-CJSC-from-VEON-Ltd--35791101/ Haykaz Mkrtchyan (talk) 17:26, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]