Talk:TekSavvy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the TekSavvy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article rationale

This article is meant to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia, providing information on telecommunications companies beyond the primary players in the industry. It provides context for the article "Internet in Canada", which references TekSavvy multiple times. It also highlights the ongoing usage-based billing debate, a major issue in Canada that extends beyond the tech industry. It has become a political issue that has been addressed by Canada's federal government, its prime minister Stephen Harper, its (then) Minister of Industry Tony Clement, and its ongoing political and sociological relationship with the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC), Canada's regulatory agency for broadcasting and telecommunications.

Sources

200GB to 25GB: Canada gets first, bitter dose of metered Internet

CRTC ruling handcuffs competitive market: Teksavvy

Telecom Decision CRTC 2011-44

CRTC's internet billing decision faces review

CRTC must reverse internet usage ruling: Clement

Liberals slam CRTC on usage-based billing

Tier Chart

When I originally created this article, I drew up a tier chart, showing TekSavvy's various DSL and Cable plans along with their respective speeds and bandwidth allotments, to showcase how their caps vary from other service providers in Canada. The article for Bell Internet has a similar chart, so it felt like it created a good comparison. However, the chart was removed early on. I am proposing the chart be re-added, or at least seek justification for why it doesn't belong.

Crumbworks (talk) 10:06, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]