Talk:Tehom

Bible Mid‑importance

	Bible portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Judaism Mid‑importance

	Judaism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Judaism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Judaism-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JudaismWikipedia:WikiProject JudaismTemplate:WikiProject JudaismJudaism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kabbalah (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kabbalah, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.KabbalahWikipedia:WikiProject KabbalahTemplate:WikiProject KabbalahKabbalah articles

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion: Interfaith Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ancient Near East Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Near East, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ancient Near East related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient Near EastWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient Near EastTemplate:WikiProject Ancient Near EastAncient Near East articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

What's up with "Tehwom"? That's just a mis-reading of the Hebrew spelling. There is no consonantal /w/ in the word. It should be deleted.

check the reference to Genesis 51:10. it does not exist.

(I assume the above is supposed to read Isaiah 51:10, as Gen 51:10 indeed does not exist.)

Cognates

The word tehom is not cognate to Tiamat according to the majority view that Tiamat is from Sumerian meaning mother of life while tehom is from the Semitic root t-h-m found also in Ugaritic meaning the ocean. It is cognate to Akkadian tamtu which is NOT another name for Tiamat, in fact not a name at all but again simply the word for ocean. Please stop cranky "Bible-is-derived-from-paganism" innuendo POV edits in this regard. The tehom = Tiamat claim is a well known error thoroughly discussed and dismissed already in the 1930s, see The Language of the Pentateuch in its Relation to Egyptian by A.S. Yahuda, Oxford University Press, 1933. Kuratowski's Ghost (talk) 03:16, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately for Mr Yahuda, his views haven't left any impression on later scholarship :) PiCo (talk) 06:17, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not true at all, his work is still regularly cited. Kuratowski's Ghost (talk) 11:46, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In this humble editor's view, the controversy above should be made explicit but inconclusive in the article itself. Simply declaring that an error is 'well known' or that someone's work is 'regularly cited' is dangerously close to weasel-wording, and it strikes us that making rigid, clear pronouncements about the meaning of ancient words is an exercise in folly. 70.89.20.65 (talk) 18:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The line from the Hebrew Bible needs to be transliterated in some standard, and consistent, way. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhutamsa (talk • contribs) 01:51, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]