Talk:Ted Morton

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: Alberta / Politics Mid‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Criticism section

Regarding edit. I tend to agree with WP:CRIT that integrating criticism of a subject through the article in relevant sections is preferable to creating a separate section collecting miscellaneous criticisms. Like other controversial public figures, Morton has been criticized for a fair number of things throughout his career. It seems much more natural to me to discuss criticisms of his tenure as a PC leadership candidate, as an MLA, as a Minsiter, etc. in those sections. Issues like Bill 208, Métis gathering rights, and Kananaskis logging are all integrated into the relevant sections. Is there any particular benefit to having a separate section just for criticism?--Trystan (talk) 06:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.nowpublic.com/coming_soon_rape_kananaskis
Triggered by \bnowpublic\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 20:26, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested edit

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

These are corrections/additions to the current listing. Currently: I am an Executive Fellow (NOT executive in residence) at the School of Public Policy and professor emeritus at the University of Calgary. I am no longer Senior Fellow, Energy and Environment, Manning Foundation (2012-2019); on the Board of the Alberta Land Institute (2012-2019); or the Board of Governors of the Council of Canadian Academies (2012-2016) These positions can be moved to the "After Politics" section.

Correction: I moved to Canada in 1973 to Toronto where I did my MA and Ph.D. at the University of Toronto. (1973-1978) I moved to Calgary in 1981.

Books: Please add the following recent publications: Law, Politics and the Judicial Process in Canada, with David Snow. 4th Edition. University of Calgary Press,2018. Moment of Truth: How to Think About Alberta's Future, with Jack Mintz and Tom Flanagan. Sutherland House, 2020.

After Politics Section: Add: Senior Fellow, Energy and Environment, Manning Foundation (2012-2019); Board member for the Alberta Land Institute (2012-2019); Board of Governors for the Council of Canadian Academies (2012-2016)

Alberta Separation: Add: In 2020 Ted co-edited Moment of Truth: How to Think About Alberta's Future, with Jack Mintz and Tom Flanagan (Sutherland House). The book argues that Alberta is systemically disadvantaged by the political status quo and must unilaterally initiate new reforms to protect its future. These reforms include most of the actions advocated in the 2001 "Alberta Agenda" (aka, "Fire-Wall") Letter. They also overlap with the "Fair Deal" reforms recently endorsed by Alberta's current Premier,Jason Kenney, and his United Conservative government.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.174.77.205 (talk) 17:31, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing the suggested edits, I corrected the University of Calgary position to match the description on the university's page, and eliminated the other listed current roles (which were not cited anyway). I also added a sentence about the new book about separation. As far as the other new publications, a bio should not be a CV. If a case can be made that those publications provide some useful perspective on Mr. Morton then perhaps they are worthy of listing. I am marking the request-edit as completed. If more is warranted I suggest a new request or ping me with citations (it has been interesting to learn that Alberta separation is even a thing).Mastimido (talk) 17:36, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]