Talk:Tecnam P92

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tecnam P92 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article name

The name of the article is currently "Tecnam P 92". The article repetitively refers to the P-92. Tecnam themselves refer to the aircraft as the "P92". Renaming. Paul Beardsell 10:22, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

design weight

"MTO design weight 1320 lbs." No. This is the USA legal weight for SLA. The design weight is something else. But what? MTOW is 1212 lb in the UK. Paul Beardsell 10:26, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have any insight into the actual design numbers. MTOW in the UK, as reflected in datasheets distributed there, is 1212 lb. MTOW in the US, on the datasheets printed there, is 1320 lb. There are lots of variants of the P92 now and I will try to incorporate a table to compare them. 64.142.50.80 (talk) 05:11, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

series vs model

Article asserts P92 is a series of related models from Tecnam. This is not my impression and is not how Tecnam itself sees it, as you can tell from their own web site. The P92 is but one of a series of similar aircraft but this family is not referred to as the P92. It's as if you referred to the Cessna 152, 172, and 182 all under one model name. Incorrect. Paul Beardsell 11:09, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should be aware that I copy, pasted the specifications from the tecnam website.And all specifications are for the SUPER ECHO model. But otherwise you have good points on other things. I will correct them immediatly C Mercieca 05:38, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Which web site? The US distributor's or the Italian manufacturer's? Whichever, should be provided as reference in the article. Paul Beardsell 08:07, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]