Talk:Teatro Luna

Theatre Low‑importance

	Theatre portal This article is part of WikiProject Theatre, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of theatre on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.TheatreWikipedia:WikiProject TheatreTemplate:WikiProject TheatreTheatre articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Zapcat. Peer reviewers: Nokuds.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:03, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

You have some great sources, this is definitely a very viable project! Thea365Instructor (talk) 16:16, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Great job! It's clear and succint. Looking forward to seeing this finesse until our peer editing day on May 17th! Thea365Instructor (talk) 23:10, 4 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jamie peer review for Zoe

Lead Section

For the lead, you have the basic information about Teatro Luna, such as the founders, why it was created, and examples of their works. If there is any information about the company's mission, it might be a good place to include that information. I think your lead gives balance of weight to all the parts of the articles.

Structure

You have divided your article into 4 (excluding references) sections (history, other projects, production history, and tours and workshops). Only by looking at the title of the sections, some might be confused as to what "other projects" mean, since the only section before "other projects" is the history of the company. Would it be better to divide the history section into two different sections like history and collaborative shows, since you start the other projects section with "In addition to their collaborative shows"? A good place for this division might be after the first paragraph.

Balanced Coverage

Again, just by the first impression of looking at your article, history section takes up bigger space than others. As written above, possible recommendation could be the dividing the section into two, or creating sub-sections within the history section.

Neutral content

I think you did a good job in maintaining a neutral view in your content.

Reliable sources

This is one of the problems I'm having in my own article, but I think it might be good to include different citations inside of your articles. Looking at other classmates' posts, some have citation for all of the shows. It might be as simple as putting citations after any information that you have attained from other sources, but it will save you a lot from any kind of plagiarizing issues.

Overall, contents are full and rich so great job!! The comments made by me are very minor so I think you can work on them very quickly :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamiesung6 (talk • contribs) 18:26, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Noah's Peer Review

Lead section

I agree with jamie that adding something about the groups mission would be good, it might also be good to talk about the impact of the group in the community or how their work has been reviewed

I also agree with jamie that having a section called "other projects" right after history feels a little awkward, maybe make the history section only about how the group was formed and make a projects section that talks about what is mentioned currently in the history section, the way you write about everything is great though!

I feel like the production history table is a little overwhelming to look at, I would suggest maybe taking out a couple columns, i think the only ones that are absolutely necessary are the name of the project and the year — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nokuds (talk • contribs) 18:36, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]