Talk:Tarot card reading

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tarot card reading article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2, 3: 365 days

Religion: New religious movements Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by New religious movements work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Occult Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Astrology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astrology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Astrology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AstrologyWikipedia:WikiProject AstrologyTemplate:WikiProject Astrologyastrology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paranormal Low‑importance

	This article falls under the scope of WikiProject Paranormal, which aims to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the paranormal and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, help with current tasks, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and discussions.ParanormalWikipedia:WikiProject ParanormalTemplate:WikiProject Paranormalparanormal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tarot spreads?

All the articles on Tarot don’t have anything about the different tarot spreads. There are a lot, too many to list in an article, but we could at least do the more common ones, like the Celtic cross spread and the three-card spread. 98.97.36.166 (talk) 03:29, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea! Collisteru (talk) 05:38, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lack of criticism concerning its effectiveness

One of the most obvious criticisms of tarot is that some people don't know if it works at all, or if it is even useful rather than a waste of time. It should be reflected in the criticism section.

I'm unsure which sources might suggest that these skeptics exist, even though it seems self-evident that they do.

We do have to be careful to maintain the NPOV, when doing so. Color511511 (talk) 15:02, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"even useful rather than a waste of time" It is a form of divination. The main article on the topic already states: "experiments do not support the idea that divination techniques can actually predict the future more reliably or precisely than would be possible without it." Dimadick (talk) 22:50, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]