Talk:Taipei Mission in the Republic of Latvia
Appearance
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Taipei Mission in the Republic of Latvia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 September 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 12:00, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Taiwan used to have a consulate general in Latvia before it was downgraded into a representative office? Source: Latvia and China: Entering the Post Optimism Period
- ALT1:
... that Taiwan used to have a consulate general in Latvia before it was downgraded into a representative office due to political pressure from China?Source: Latvia and China: Entering the Post Optimism Period - Reviewed:
- ALT1:
Created by Toadboy123 (talk). Self-nominated at 09:39, 15 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Taipei Mission in the Republic of Latvia; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy compliance:
- Adequate sourcing:
- Neutral:
- Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing: - possible CLOP
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems: - just a minor critique.
QPQ: - Not done
Overall: @Toadboy123: Good article. QPQ needed. Earwig does report what looks to be possible WP:CLOP that I would like explained. Also, the article doesn't exactly state that political pressure from China was the cause of the downgrading. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: I have updated the article to state the reasoning of the downgrading which seems to be that of economic reasons rather than that of political pressure. And also, could you let me know which part of the article has WP:CLOP issue? Toadboy123 (talk) 02:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Toadboy123: See, [1]. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: I have made additional edits and the tool states its only 10.7% (violation unlikely). Is the article all clear for DYK so that I can now proceed QPQ? - Toadboy123 (talk) 17:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Toadboy123: Looks good now. Though, Alt1 doesn't seem to work as a hook now considering your new changes. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: I agree that we can go for the first hook I stated since ALT1 won't work after my edits. Regarding QPQ, I have completed it. (Template:Did you know nominations/Wu Xiaoyan) - Toadboy123 (talk) 04:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- Approve alt0 Onegreatjoke (talk) 18:55, 24 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: I agree that we can go for the first hook I stated since ALT1 won't work after my edits. Regarding QPQ, I have completed it. (Template:Did you know nominations/Wu Xiaoyan) - Toadboy123 (talk) 04:26, 22 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Toadboy123: Looks good now. Though, Alt1 doesn't seem to work as a hook now considering your new changes. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:41, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke: I have made additional edits and the tool states its only 10.7% (violation unlikely). Is the article all clear for DYK so that I can now proceed QPQ? - Toadboy123 (talk) 17:14, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Toadboy123: See, [1]. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:10, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Onegreatjoke and Toadboy123: Unless I'm missing something, I'm not sure how this qualifies as interesting to a wider audience... ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:37, 11 August 2023 (UTC)
- @AirshipJungleman29: Due to One China policy dictating that countries can't have official diplomatic relations with ROC and how Latvia went on with the establishment of official Taiwanese diplomatic office (consulate) while still maintaining relations with China seems interesting. - Toadboy123 (talk) 09:15, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class Latvia articles
- Unknown-importance Latvia articles
- WikiProject Latvia articles
- C-Class International relations articles
- Unknown-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- C-Class Taiwan articles
- Low-importance Taiwan articles
- WikiProject Taiwan articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles