Talk:TV JOJ

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Slovakia Low‑importance

	Slovakia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

TV Joj woefully failed

Statements like this need dealing with if readers aren't going to be left with the opinion that this article isn't written from a neutral point of view as required by policy. Adambro (talk) 18:51, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

deleting of diskussions :-(

Slovak version of this page is bad. Any discussion is deleted.

Shame to wikipedia , as it it loosing its freedom ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.141.94.169 (talk) 22:18, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A few points

It's worthy of pointing out, that TV JOJ is now the second largest television, beating STV. And I'd also like to tell that there will be HD versions of both JOJ and JOJ Plus this fall (according to JOJ's director). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.40.182.3 (talk) 23:53, 14 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Am I on wikipedia?...

There's a couple bullcrap statements in this article about the ownership of the channel, someone please fix em'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.95.155.8 (talk) 10:09, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:26, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obligatory CS188 reference

We will do whatever it takes...to get the JOJ. We care more about the JOJ and doing the JOJ right than anything else.

But seriously, how am I the first person to make this reference? (Don't worry, this post is exclusive to the talk page! I'm not THAT guy.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.164.139.25 (talk) 04:00, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Request

No proper citation. smartalek22 (talk) 22:16, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Tv joj 2020.png

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:23, 14 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]