Talk:TEM-function

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 6 August 2020 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

Geology

	Geology portal Talk:TEM-function is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The references

There papers by the creator of the article gave cause for concern since they are the sole references. I have no strong feelings about deletion/retention of this article since it also advertises the main author of all three papers Fiddle Faddle 07:29, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The method is not widely accepted. In fact, it only relies on couple of papers from the same author. Nowadays, everyone who writes papers can publish articles on wikipedia on their methods. In my opinion only methods confirmed by majority deserve being published here.

The same author also promotes concepts like Lak wettability index. But neither TEM function, nor Lak wettability index can be found on any single petrophysics book.

There are a lot of similar methods from different authors that are used much more widely. For example USBM wettability index, Amott wettability index, Washburn method, etc. 212.45.83.5 (talk) 15:51, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]