Talk:Systems of Survival

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature

Jacobs and this book merit a wider set categories

I believe that this book is a notable work for its contribution to areas like moral philosophy, cultural anthropology, and memetic evolution, etc. But what is needed are verifiable sources to cite before it would be approriate to put this publication or Jane Jacobs into other categories. If anyone wanted to do a little research, this might be an area. SteveWolfer 18:56, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article needs more content

I created a good start for the article, but some areas are real skimpy - like a description of the conflicts arising out of following a percept from an opposing syndrome. And I don't have any quotes or references from outside sources or book reviews. I hope others will hop on in and make improvements and additions. SteveWolfer 18:59, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea for a project. Bruce Swanson 16:52, 25 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by BruceSwanson (talk • contribs)

Article doesn't acknowledge dialog form

It is a great book and deserves better treatment. I note that the article suggests that Jacobs actually holds the positions advocated by participants in a dialog, and that is by no means obvious. Plato used dialog in a similar way and we do not necessarily attribute positions introduced in the dialog to Plato himself. We are meant to continue the dialog, to take part. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.0.57.157 (talk) 22:54, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]