Talk:System of Transcendental Idealism

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the System of Transcendental Idealism article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Philosophy: Literature / Metaphysics / Modern Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Metaphysics
	Modern philosophy

Gibberish

I've read some nonsense on WP but this takes the biscuit. I'm not surprised it doesn't have an intro. How can you sum up stuff like this? It's just jargon piled on jargon. Strip that away and there's nothing left. The idea that there are "technical problems" with the argument here is beyond fantasy. There is no argument at all, it is simply bizarre statements of fact with no logical connection. Fecknuts (talk) 06:31, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]