Talk:Swiss Cottage Secondary School

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Singapore Low‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Biased article

As a student of this school, I must clarify that this article is completely and utterly bias. For one, the school focuses a huge bulk of its resources on only 1 or 2 of their co-curricular activities, namely Band and sports, while abandoning and underfunding other CCAs. Furthermore, students complain that the school does not provide a conducive learning environment, yet alone holistic.

Clean-up

The article currently looks like a rather scrappy advertisement for the school, full of gushing language (of the management-speak kind) in the first-person. It needs a good overhaul. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 10:09, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've just removed a load of puffery and flannel from the article and made highly specific citation requests. The article was very poor. It is not only poor. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 06:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 10:39, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Schcrest.jpg

Image:Schcrest.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Undue weight

The band, however good it is, is a part of the school. It takes huge prominence in the article. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 06:48, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]