Talk:Sutton 58

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Skyscrapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skyscrapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles that relate to skyscrapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkyscrapersWikipedia:WikiProject SkyscrapersTemplate:WikiProject SkyscrapersSkyscraper articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Sutton 58 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 November 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that after plans for the skyscraper Sutton 58 prompted a height limit for the surrounding area, construction went ahead anyway?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sutton 58.

Wikipedia

Additional references

I've already used more references for the first revision than were strictly neccesary in order to facilitate expansion by others. In addition to save everyone 5-10 minutes of time in searches I'm leaving a list of sources below in roughly chronological order; some of these are already in use but not all are. City Realty has some info on the design and interiors if anyone wants to get a start on another section.

Extended content

𝒬 𝔔 15:36, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. This is convenient - I can look at these over the weekend. – Epicgenius (talk) 02:44, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Quantocius Quantotius, I've taken a look over the past few days. If you don't mind, I would like to nominate this to WP:DYK as this is pretty good so far. – Epicgenius (talk) 00:16, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Epicgenius: Go right ahead. I'm not familiar with that process, but I trust your judgment. You don't need to credit me at all if that will complicate things. I may log back in again at some point this week, but it could just as easily be a month until I have time again, so if you need anything additional I may be able to help, but no guarantees. (please ping on reply)

𝒬 𝔔 21:48, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 06:41, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that after plans for the Sutton 58 skyscraper prompted a height limit for the surrounding area, construction went ahead anyway? Source: [Hurowitz, Noah (October 22, 2015). "Skyscraper Foes Raising Money to Fund Review for Sutton Place Rezoning Plan". DNAinfo.] (2) Colman, Michelle (June 27, 2018). "City says work can resume on Sutton Place's controversial 800-foot tower". 6sqft
- ALT1:... that the Sutton 58 skyscraper was built even though its developer filed for bankruptcy and its plans directly prompted a height limit for the neighborhood? Source: Same as above

Reviewed: Meme stock
Comment: QPQ pending. Not too many interesting hooks here that I can think of sadly.

Created by Quantocius Quantotius (talk). Nominated by Epicgenius (talk) at 23:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Decided to review this first as I plan to do a DYK hook myself and will need to do a QPQ.

Hooks look ok, article looks new, but will suggest a bit of rephrasing:

ATL2: That despite the height limit imposed in the neighbourhood where the Sutton 58 skyscraper is to be built, construction went ahead anyway?
ATL3: That despite the developer filing for bankruptcy and the height limit in the neighbourhood, construction of the Sutton 58 skyscraper went ahead anyway?

--ZKang123 (talk) 12:21, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ZKang123: Thanks for the review. The height limit was imposed because of Sutton 58 (which is actually being built, rather than just being planned.) But if you think that height-limit detail is not important, then ALT2 or ALT3 may work. I've also done a QPQ now. Epicgenius (talk) 00:34, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok then. No copyvio problems, looks ok. Ready for promotion.--ZKang123 (talk)

ALT0 to T:DYK/P7