Talk:Suthar

The use of the contentious topics procedure has been authorised by the community for pages related to South Asian social groups, including this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be sanctioned.

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

April 23,2011

This article is in serious need of a rewrite. I have moved a copy to User:Buster7/Sandbox-Suthar for the re-construction phase. Any help is welcomed. Buster Seven Talk 03:08, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Impossible task! I can not make sense from the available info and I have no interest in further pursuit of editing this article. Deletion is most likely the best answer. Buster Seven Talk 06:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MAGHARAM SUTHAR IS A BIG MAN IN OVER VILLAGE — Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.89.181.201 (talk) 09:32, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect

I propose we redirect this article to Sutradhars of Assam. Suthar is short for Sutradhar. The Sutradhar article is much better sourced. There seems little that can be saved from this article, as there are no sources backing up any of its statements, and I could not find any. Work permit (talk) 23:46, 3 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted unsourced statements, which were recently added by an IP [1] and were difficult to understand. -- Work permit (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but you are making a real hash of this. I have commented at Talk:Sutradhar (caste) and urge you to consider the provisions of WP:RM and WP:COMMONNAME in full. Your most recent edits to this article effectively created a situation where we had two distinct articles sharing the same content whereas the procedure would be to merge where necessary and leave a redirect to the preferred title. I have had to force a redirect here, even if only on a temporary basis, so that things do not get even more messy prior to consensus to appear or be rejected regarding your proposals. - Sitush (talk) 21:03, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback from New Page Review process

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Thanks for taking the time to make an article on Wikipedia. Have a wonderful day!

Tavantius (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Origin

The incorrect history has been removed from what is stated in the reference and the true history has been added Vipin Babu lumia (talk) 15:28, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

origin

In the original tests mentioned in the reference, Sutars belong to Vishwa Brahmins, temples are built by Brahmins and not by Vishwa Brahmins. This is wrong. When the number of Vishwa Brahmins brought to build the temple was not enough, they were converted from other caste workers to Vishwa Brahmins. This is the real history.The original history is written in the reference Sudhar Caste History given as No. 6 Vipin Babu lumia (talk) 15:32, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]