Talk:Susan Polis Schutz

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Initial comments

This article strikes me as falling short of Wikipedia quality:

First, the bulk of the page seems to be derived from an article in another source, although it isn't properly referenced.

Second, the style is far more florid than is appropriate for an encyclopedia.

Third, this appears to be a vanity article. The article was a stub until a single anonymous user made significant additions.

Fourth, the article is highly POV and might even be described as fawning. Some consideration should be paid to other views of Schutz's work.

And fifth, the article may be mistitled; if the subject is going to be Schutz's company, Blue Mountain Arts, then that should be the title.

I will make some revisions to address these issues, but since I am new to this I wanted to make my reasoning clear and invite others to give their opinion. ombret 17:40, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Only" $35 million cash

Wow, if my family business sold for only $35 million, I'd be disappointed too. This article twists and turns through positive and negative POV like a snake. I'd clean it up if I could see how. Paul 19:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

== It Is 2010, Mature Editing Would Be Great==

I can't beleve it is now the year 2010 and this page has not been edited yet! It would be nice to see how to get to it. Susan Polis Schultz has a natural design as far as art. Her writings are about life, love, encouragement,and so forth. Everyone needs a kind word at one moment or time in life.Why badger Blue Mountain? They are just as good as Hallmark..... Thankyou, A.P.V/02-2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.87.220.94 (talk) 16:58, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

POV biased

Especially the last section is written like an advertisement Stapmoshun (talk) 18:19, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ouch, yeah that paragraph was pretty bad. I edited it heavily to remove a lot of the opinionated language. A lot of the language was just unmarked quotes from the film's synopsis page or other stuff like that. Hopefully my edit is an improvement. ScottCarammell (talk) 11:38, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Book merge

I have merged the article To My Daughter with Love on the Important Things in Life after a search for indications of WP:NBOOK and finding none.

Vegantics (talk) 17:05, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]