Talk:Susan M. Gaines

This article was nominated for deletion on 7 May 2010. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Susan M. Gaines is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women scientists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Laurids2 (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. (declared here Note: Claims to be the subject of the article.)

AFD?

I'm dubious about SMG's notability. The article doesn't assert it. The only sci paper listed is from 1988 and doesn't look very exciting William M. Connolley (talk) 18:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Going... going... William M. Connolley (talk) 20:19, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it will fail, but maybe we need an AFD here? She is not covered by WP:ACADEMIC as far as I can see, but she is fairly covered by WP:BASIC that states "A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published[3] secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent,[4] and independent of the subject.[5]". Nsaa (talk) 20:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could be. But there is none of that in the article William M. Connolley (talk) 20:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

COI template tag was added without explanation. Review and remove?

This tag was added without identifying which edits were controversial and why. Wikipedia rules note that it may be removed by editors who do not have a conflict of interest after the problem is resolved or if the problem is not explained on the article's talk page. Please review this page and remove the tag if you do not find any controversial or unreferenced edits. Or remove any problematic edits.Laurids2 (talk) 16:05, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appropriate tag, as you are promoting yourself in some of the edits. Under discussion at WP:COIN. --- Possibly ☎ 19:26, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the discussion at WP:COIN. Yes, I am the subject of this biographical entry. I did not create it but once I noticed it, I wanted to make it more accurate and complete (which I understood that Wikipedia permits). I was not trying to "promote myself" (see discussion), but now see how some edits could give that impression. Please see the discussion at WP:COIN, remove any edits deemed "promotional" or controversial, and remove the tag. I am not editing anything now and as the subject of this page, can't remove them myself.Laurids2 (talk) 09:03, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Revise as needed and remove COI tag

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

This tag has now been explained and discussed. See above and WP:COIN Please review and revise as needed for neutrality, and remove tag. I did not add the article, but am the subject and tried to correct and improve it (as an inexperienced Wiki editor), which caused editors to perceive problems. I am no longer editing anything! Laurids2 (talk) 07:54, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Agreed, this reads fairly neutrally now and is well-sourced. Tag removed. Tacyarg (talk) 08:16, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Already done Melmann 17:05, 13 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]