Jump to content

Talk:Surf culture/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2

Contents menu position

Is it possible to fix the position of the contents menu panel, so it appears beside the introduction, rather than below it with blank space beside it? Maradja 00:29, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

That's been fixed. —Kenyon (t·c) 08:29, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Post Surf Culture for speedy deletion

I've requested speedy deletion of the apparent attack page Post Surf Culture. I mention it here because this is the only page that currently links to it, so the link should presumably be deleted from this page if the attack article is indeed deleted. --Officiallyover 14:23, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Awesome expansion of this article!

See talk:Gidget for some background. Andrewa 07:43, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

"Localism" Inaccurate/Incomplete?

It's interesting that only the negative side of "localism" is portraied in this article.

Don't get me wrong, localism has a very definate negative side.

But it also has a positive side, where groms and newcomers pay their dues and are mentored by older, more experienced locals in a give spot or area. This is somewhat like an apprenticeship.

Also, we don't reference well know "surf gangs" like Da Hui and the Bra Boys, who are intricately tied in with localism and surf culture and have Wikipedia entries of their own. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dougirwin13 (talk • contribs) 01:17, September 20, 2006 (UTC)

Yeah, and everything before the Quotes section should probably be broken up into more sections. —Kenyon (t·c) 08:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Agree that if such can be found it should be included. Anarchangel (talk) 06:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
My group and i have added information on surf gangs and it may take a day or two to get all of the citation it, but we're working on it!:) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kassie0303 (talk • contribs) 03:09, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Surf Gangs

Hi guys, like i said earlier my group contributed a section about surf gangs. We thought this relevant to localism because of the tendency for gangs to form because of this value. 3 out of 4 gangs are not listed on Wikipedia so we thought it would be important to add them considering their prevelance in surf culture. We did give a brief description of the Bra Boys and added a hyperlink to their other page on Wikipedia. We are still waiting for the citations to be put in for Cito Rats and they should be up soon. Let us know what you think! user:Kassie0303 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kassie0303 (talk • contribs) 03:54, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

I think the gangs should be added as it's part of the localism that has already been mentioned.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 05:55, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

General Surfing Issues

I've added merge tags to three sections that seem to belong more in the general surfing article than this surfing culture sub-article. I think they fall out of the scope of this article. -- Jmartinsson 20:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Billabong logo.gif

Image:Billabong logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:12, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Rip Curl.png

Image:Rip Curl.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:02, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Under "fashion", should Hollister Co. be added?

i think it should because technically, hollister's theme is california, surfing, and beach... what does everyone else think? - J-Whitt 02:37, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Quiksilver.jpg

Image:Quiksilver.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:06, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Billabong Logo.svg

Image:Billabong Logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Fasttimes.jpg

Image:Fasttimes.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Liquid-time-1.jpg

Image:Liquid-time-1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Delete surf terminology

A large section of this article is a list of surf terminology. There is already a link to a glossary of surfing terms on Wiktionary, which appears to be a more appropriate place. Unless I hear otherwise in the next few days, I will be deleting this section. Please post any thoughts about this removal on this talk page. Thanks, Alanraywiki (talk) 14:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

I am moving the surf terminology to the talk page for a few more days. That will allow any valid words not included on Wiktionary to be moved over there.
Air: getting airborne
Aerial: airborne maneuver
Amped: charged up; stoked; fired
Backdoor: to pull into a tube from behind the peak
Bail: to abandon a board; jump off; usually without regard to the board's future
Bake: a closeout
Barreled: this is when the tube catches up to you and you bail
Bashing: body surfing
Bitchen: top notch stoke
Boost: getting airborne off the lip
Brah: from bruddah, Hawaiian pidgin for brother
Bro: a buddy or friend
Bro-in-a push from a friend into a wave
Bucked: helmet
Bump: a swell
Bumps: the build-up of wax on a surfboard deck
Carve: symmetrical, fluid turns
Cheater five: five toes on the nose — keep your weight back on the board to maintain trim and speed, squat down and extend one foot forward
Clucked: afraid, intimidated by the wave
Crew: a group of surfers defined by break or area
Cutback: a maneuver where the surfer turns sharply back towards the breaking portion of the wave. See also 'S-turn'
Deck: the top surface of the board
Ding: damage to a surfboard
Dogging: going backside in the pit
Drop: as in dropping from the crest of the wave to the pit
Dropping in: catching a wave that is already occupied ... taking off on the shoulder while someone is taking off deeper
Drop in late: catching the steepest part of a wave
Dune: a big peaky wave
Epoxy: alternative board construction to foam
Falls: the pitching lip of the wave — don't get sucked into this
Fan: a fan of spray off a turn such as a water skier throws
Fluff: spray off the lip
Falls: top of the wave pitches out and throws a waterfall shoreward
Fish: a type of short surfboard that is wide, fairly thick for added buoyancy and has two fins; popular in the 1970s
Frigged: snaked
Full on: with commitment and intensity
Funky: A slang term for cool, used by surfers regularly
Fuzz: the police a term use in earlier days
Gash: very sharp turn
Gnarly: awesome and intimidating
Going off: a break under optimum conditions
Goofy Foot: Someone who has his right foot forward instead of his left
Gouge: sharp, fast turn
Gremmies: grem or gremmie is short for gremlin — Sixties US term for young, possibly or probably mischievous surfer, pre-adolescent surfer
Green room: inside a full cover-up tube
Grommet: adolescent surfer
Gun: a variant of board shape made for big waves
Gunned: under-gunned or over-gunned; refers to the size of your board in relation to wave conditions
Hawaiian scale: a system of wave measurement used by surfers
Hiddie: from hideous,intense
Hooting: howling and yelping approval and encouragement to buddies
Jag: retreat after getting worked
Kook: someone posing very hard as a surfer. An unskilled surfer
Lineup: the location in the ocean where the outer waves are breaking
Lip: the portion of the wave that is breaking and falling from top to bottom, especially in hollow waves
Local: a person who lives near a surfspot and surfs there almost daily
Log: a long surfboard
Meatball flag: black with a yellow dot in the middle, means no surfing today
Mondo: Another synonym for cool.
Nipped: nipples rubbed raw by board or suit
Noodle: exhausted, overall condition or specific as in noodle armed
Nose ride: to walk up to the front of the deck
Outrageous: An adjective used to describe a particularly difficult wave or surf session
Over the falls: inadvertently riding the lip of a wave as it breaks rather than the face of the wave
Pit: the hollow-est portion of a breaking wave
Pitch: throw — angle of any run to rise
Pitted: being in the pit of the wave
Pearl: to go pearl diving, the nose of you board submerges and usually the wave pushes the rest of the board over the nose, you too
Pintail: the shape of the tailend of a surfboard, tapering to a point
Pop: kick out
Pop-out: a surfboard that comes from a mold for mass production, in contrast to being shaped.
Poser: a non-surfer playing the role of a surfer
Pucker factor: the effect an intimidating wave has on ones ability to remain relaxed
Puff: a spitting wave
Pumping: above average large swell
Quiver: a surfer's collection of boards, a board bag that holds several boards
Rails: the side edges of the board that interact with the wave's energy
Rip: to surf to the height of one's abilities
Rocker: the bend in the board, as in a rocking chair
Room: inside a large barrel
S-turn: an advanced maneuver where a sharp turn is made on the shoulder of the wave in the shape of an 'S'; a type of cutback
Schlong: thick, long, old style single-fin surfboard
Squid: unlikeable individual
Scab: a reef or rock
Scabbed: getting damaged by a reef or rock
Shred: ability to execute rapid repeated turns — shortboard term
Sick: excellent, top notch — describing a surfer, stunt, maneuver or conditions
Sideslip: when your board stops tracking forward and moves sideways
Slam: bounce off the lip as it begins to pitch
Slash: cutback
Staff (staph): Infections from polluted water and open wounds
Snake: paddling around behind someone who is in position and stealing their wave. Effectively the snake is taking ownership of the wave by being the closest rider to the breaking portion of the wave
Spray: the water coming off a wave
Stink-eye: hard, cold, menacing stare
Stoked: geared up, wound up, full of enthusiasm
Stylie: with good form — with grace
SUP: stand up paddle surfing
Sup: asking another surfer what they have been doing
Surfer's knots: large bumps on the tops of feet and on knees caused by callusing where one continuously contacts a board
Stuffed: getting driven under the water by a wave coming down on you
Swish: a meek or fearful surfer
Thrashed: when a wave lays a beating on you
Throwing tail: sliding the tail in a turn, breaking the grip of the fins
Thruster: a surboard with 3 fins with the center fin more towards the tail
Tow-in surfing/Tow-ins: getting towed into waves that are too large to paddle into
Trim: adjusting your position on a board so that it planes, and achieves its maximum speed
Tube: the cylindrical or cone shaped hole created when the lip pitches out far and clean enough to create a space between the wave and the falls
Vertical: turn straight up the wave
Waffling: rapidly working the board back and forth
Wahine: A young female surfer
Wannabe: wan-na-be, someone who wants to be a skater
Wax: paraffin + color + scent + additives to make it apply at specific temperatures. Used on deck of boards for traction
Wipe out: a fall, particularly a spectacular fall
Worked, getting: the action a wave plays on you. It feels like being in a large washing machine
Wyatt: Slang for a horrible surfer.
Zoo: excessively crowded in the water
Alanraywiki (talk) 15:51, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Probably solved. There is a link to Wiktionary now, that has a long list of surf slang, and a short list at Surfing. Anarchangel (talk) 06:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

The image Image:Bigwednesdaycover.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --12:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

"Surfer" high schools in the Los Angeles area

The article needs to mention the various high schools in the Los Angeles area which have always had a large surfer student body such as Venice High, Santa Monica High, Palisades High, Culver City High.--jeanne (talk) 15:59, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if it needs to, but if the article does include "surfer" high schools then there should be a citation from a reliable source that they are considered such. And because this is a worldwide encyclopedia, I would not limit it to just L.A. high schools. Alanraywiki (talk) 16:09, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Well, I attended Venice High and it was always called a "surfer" high school, same as the others I listed. And yes, it shouldn't be limited to Los Angeles.Finding the sources which label them as such could be a time-consuming problem though.--jeanne (talk) 16:14, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
The lack of citations is a huge problem with this article. The article really needs to become more encyclopedic, so more verifiable content and less original research is needed. So while I personally don't have a problem with adding a section like that, we really do need citations. That would include the "surfer" high school I attended, Huntington Beach High School. Thanks, Alanraywiki (talk) 16:25, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Stupid Article

Sorry, but this article is just dumb. What next? A full-length article about water skiing culture? --98.196.33.67 (talk) 11:05, 21 December 2008 (UTC)

Why is it dumb to use your expresion? Surfing and the culture which accompanies the sport/lifestyle has been around for many decades in places such as Southern California, Hawaii, Australia, so an article is quite appropriate.--jeanne (talk) 08:02, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Struck WP:SOAPBOX not furthering the improvement of the main article. Do not feed the trolls. Anarchangel (talk) 06:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Spirituality

I just do not believe someone set out to make a 'spirituality' section about how some surfers are Christians. Someone please look in the history for the original stuff, thank you. Help WP help you. Anarchangel (talk) 06:09, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Issues with two large similar changes

A major addition was made here [1]. I removed it with this comment "Removes uncited personal essay. Although well enough written, it's in a style suited to a magazine or a school essay. The idea of an encyclopedia is to stick to verifiable facts." The material was reworked in an interesting way here [2]. But I don't feel the basic issues were resolved. (Btw, I live on a coast with surfing, so I am familiar with the culture.)

Surfers have a belief that somehow because their interest is embodied by the Beach Boys and in Hollywood movies that somehow their passion is different from that of skateboarders, rock climbers, scuba-divers, or even gun collectors. Nothing is unique about the passion: Birdwatchers go on "quests" and it becomes their "lifestyle". Every climbing rock has a unique attraction to climbers. Every trail changes seasonally to interest avid hikers.

Phrases such as "truly perfect surf conditions" have no verifiable meaning. What's perfect for a beginner is not for someone else. What's a good challenge for one person is an impossible challenge for another. Another WP:PEACOCK phrase is "throughout its long history"? Who are you kidding? People have been collecting coins for thousands of years. If anything (to a historian), surfing has a quite brief history. Regardless, the observation is unnecessary and subjective. "The goals of those who practice the sport vary"? Yeah, they do. Where's "Being socially correct in Southern California", "Being a girl magnet", and "Having beach parties?" What percentage of people each as central to their lifestyle? Are there surveys? Yes? Then quote them. Phrases such as "embraces more traditional capitalistic ideals" are not just WP:PEACOCK they subjective and biased (WP:NPOV). I.e., unacceptable for Wikipedia — even if given a citation.

Examples of Wiki articles that go pretty far into "culture" but still manage to keep a reasonably encyclopedic tone are Hiking and Birdwatching. They include material of the type that is already in Surfing, but they also have the kind of information about practical documented aspects of culture that would go well in this article. Compare Surf culture's "Issues affecting surfers" with Hiking's "Environmental impact", for example.

Google books. "Surfing culture" [3] Great references, and "limited preview" material IS citable in Wiki. Go for it.

Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 08:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the essay. However, twenty excellent deletion rationales are never worth an imperfect inclusion. You are quite within your rights to refuse to clean up, but that does not give you a licence to cut out if cutting makes the article worse. You offer much shaky criticism and a smattering of the vaguest solutions but your only concrete action is to gut the article. Your PoV is showing also, it is ridiculous to say that something cannot be included if it is cited, and living on a raft made of surfboards would not give you more credibility here, so forget that. Comparing an article about the culture to articles about the activity (Birdwatching) to is comparing apple pie to oranges and saying it is ok, but a little overdone. You have removed a huge swath of text -and an image- with only three objections and no mention of the jpg; I suggest you make further specific objections if you wish the text improved. I will rework the text in line with the suggestions you have given so far. You need to AGF a little, especially since the authors are only doing things that you yourself do; 'throughout its long history' is more than typical for starting articles, and only means the person could not be bothered to look up the exact date, just as you cannot be bothered to fix the article. Anarchangel (talk) 09:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

The references are great. They give readers something to go on. Things they can check for themselves. Valuable.
What's not valuable is the personal opinion expressed in uncited essay language by SYSS Mouse. Size doesn't matter. I can compose 5,000 words of original text in an hour (that's 11 times as much as was added). That doesn't mean a single word of that 5,000 is appropriate for Wikipedia. If I had one fixed concept, possibly all of it would be unuseful.
I modified the first section to highlight issues with the article.
You, thinking it through, finding references, generally making an effort is good. SYSS Mouse dumping lots of free-association rambling isn't helpful. We shouldn't be discussing his edits, when you could invest your effort by writing better material yourself. Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 11:37, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
The same references you laud were in my first edit. I added material to the first edit. If I did not spend my time rescuing articles from editors waving their arms chidingly at the orchestra and throwing away pages from the libretto, believing they are conducting, I might have time to perfect my prose. When you have added a single word, you will be in a better position to advise me. 5k in an hour? Hah. Anarchangel (talk) 15:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Take a really good look at this list of five citations, all from Google Books. They are all for a brand that you deleted. This brand has been famous since the early 1960s, and is more famous than you would ever be if you got a book on the New York bestseller list tomorrow. It was snipped out with a snide aside and the assumption that it did not belong. -The edit. Edit summary: ("Oldest running ad"? Um. Possibly interesting. Would need a citation, though. Removes the usual BS about how something is becoming more popular all the time.) -
• [4] • [5] • [6] • [7] • [8]
Make no mistake about it. You have been and continue to make the article worse than it was with every edit. Learn your craft or go somewhere far away. Anarchangel (talk) 18:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Citing an unencyclopedic statement from a reference doesn't make the statement ok. There is no such thing as "truly perfect surf conditions". You accept such phraseology because you are used to hearing it. But it has no encyclopedic, provable, testable meaning. And this is an encyclopedia, not a fan site. A provable meaning would be something like: a survey taken of several experts, each independently reviewing video examples of waves, each specifying whether the example is "perfect" or not.
That sounds odd to you? That's because you are not dealing with objective fact. Define "perfect surf" -- definitively -- and then it can be included in an encyclopedia article. "Perfect surf" is not in "Webster's 3rd International Dictionary". Nor does any meaning of "perfect" seem vaguely related. Piano non troppo (talk) 17:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Also, responding to your citations here in discussion, just above. References showing that surfing is popular is NOT the same as claiming it is "becoming more popular all the time". Maybe surfing popularity has dropped dramatically in the last years. Do you have proof, one way or the other? Piano non troppo (talk) 17:32, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
Surfing and the Internet (previously deleted material)

Internet

Surfing portals

Surfing blogs

The below are representative of the hundreds of surf blogs created since 2002.

Live surf cams

Surf forecasting

Main article: Surf forecasting
Thousands of sites offer surf forecasting and reporting, from single beaches to the entire world. Among them are:

CD-ROM

Video games about surfing

3D models

Anarchangel (talk) 20:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

Religious aspects

The article states, rather suspiciously in my view, that Nat Young attempted to "register surfing as a religion". This reminds me of the spurious claims made as part of the Jedi census phenomenon that if enough people said they were Jedis it would become an 'official' religion, with no details on what exactly that was meant to mean. Does the Australian government maintain an official list of religions? I doubt it somehow. Second point: an academic article by Bron Taylor is mentioned, but not explicitly cited. Please can anyone who knows it add the full bibliographic information so that people can get at the original. Furthermore, there is a claim of extensive discussion of Taylor's article in surfing magazines. Which surfing magazines, when? That's two references to something in the literature without the basic details that would allow readers to follow it up. Beorhtwulf (talk) 15:03, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Surf culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:18, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Surf culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:38, 14 February 2016 (UTC)

Surf Gangs

The section on surf gangs as it's currently written feels like a paraphrase of the source magazines rather than an encyclopedic article, and it has a pretty obvious editorial slant intended to portray surf gangs as beneficial/necessary to the maintenance of order and safety in local surf spots. When reality has a bias towards a position, it is what it is, but there's no cited empirical research to support baking that angle into the article. Instead, we have gems like:

"In an incident where a tourist cut off a friend of Alexander’s in a dangerous six-foot swell, the Wolfpak leader beat up the visitor for his poor decision and later reflected on the positive outcomes native enforcement could bring."

Which is highly anecdotal, uses inappropriately unsupported judgmental language, and to top it off, the source is throwing 404s. Looking at internet archive, it's a brief retrospective from a member of the Wolfpak. This is not even remotely defensible to include with that wording. The surf gang section as a whole doesn't seem to be written in a manner that expands the overarching 'surf culture' article. Each part is just kind-of there. I'd suggest just scrapping them in their present state. Until there's something better there, it seems more sensible to just mention them by name in the localism section for notability. 69.80.178.4 (talk) 00:02, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Surf culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Surf culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:43, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Surf culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:59, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Surf_culture/Archive_1&oldid=935001451"