Talk:Supplied-air respirator/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about Supplied-air respirator. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Amkgp (talk) 06:13, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that supplied-air respirators, unlike N95 masks, can be used in atmospheres that are oxygen-deficient or immediately dangerous to life or health? Source: [1], pp. 5ff

Reviewed: Typhoon Yancy (1990)

Created by HLHJ (talk) and John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk). Nominated by John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) at 01:36, 21 August 2020 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

SD0001 (talk) 05:07, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

[Repositioned talk section]

John P. Sadowski (NIOSH), is this an OK stub? Expert review welcome. HLHJ (talk) 18:57, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

@HLHJ: Looks good, and just long enough to be another DYK candidate. John P. Sadowski (NIOSH) (talk) 01:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Great, thank you. I have no objection to a DYK, but I don't think I want to be shepherding two DYKs at once, so I think I'll let it go. If I find myself expanding it 5x at a future date, I might DYK it then.

HLHJ (talk) 01:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)