Talk:Superphénix

France Mid‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

‹See TfM›

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Three of the references are broken, including "erreur404.org"... a joke? So we need to find replacements. Ultrarob 19:57, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1.21GW? Really? 72.254.31.54 (talk) 19:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yes, really (24.45.165.89 (talk) 02:06, 18 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]

the introduction was faaaar from neutral. It was obvious written by someone frantically opposed to nuclear energy. 189.216.180.254 (talk) 00:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Operation

Is there any reason the 1998 date of closure shouldn't be the last item in this segment? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.252.217.51 (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect it to be an error and maybe it should be 1988? 77.188.176.250 (talk) 11:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Make sense of the "green" politics here?

Does anyone else find it baffling why a so-called pro-environmental group would take such drastic action against this plant? Aren't these the same people who are now complaining there is too much carbon dioxide in the air? Didn't it ever occur to them that would be the direct result of their anti-nuclear stance? Last time I checked, nuclear was the only commercially viable zero-CO2 option that could someday actually replace *all* use of "fossil fuels" for power generation. Zaphraud (talk) 09:44, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ask the japanese if they find it baffling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.59.119.38 (talk) 22:11, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I find it baffling. Many more Japanese died because of coal than because of nuclear energy. Now they complain that we can't do anything with the waste...189.216.180.254 (talk) 00:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is baffling because anti-nuclear protesters often raise the issue of security of nuclear plants, but the most dangerous terrorist attack to those facilities was carried out by a Green Party politician. Weird enough. The japanese, anyway, are reconsidering nuclear policy after Fukushima, but they are not having an atom exit: they elected an openly pro-nuclear mayor in Tokyo and an openly pro-nuclear PM like Shinzo Abe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.52.5.237 (talk) 11:44, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]