Talk:Supermarine Sea Lion I
Appearance
Supermarine Sea Lion I has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: September 4, 2021. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Will it float?
[edit]Can somebody who knows more about it than me check & confirm she was a flying boat & not a floatplane? Trekphiler (talk) 01:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- The image of G-EALP in British Civil Aircraft since 1919 shows it is a flying boat (and so does the description). MilborneOne (talk) 10:50, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- A picture of the Sea Lion I appeared in Flight in 1940 Flightglobal 18-Apr-1940. MilborneOne (talk) 13:15, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Supermarine Sea Lion I/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 21:15, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
Comments
- "at Bournemouth, England in" comma after England.
- Could link Aircraft registration.
- "British elimination trials" what were these?
- "Later on during the race, the aircraft inverted and sank " presumably it was on the water at the time?
- " Lion I.[1] [8]" no spaces between refs.
- "the fly-off the" what's that?
- "Supermarine remained at sea" the company Supermarine?
- "Aircraft 1919-1972." en-dash.
That's all I have, nice article. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:11, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- @The Rambling Man: All above points addressed, thanks for the review. Amitchell125 (talk) 13:00, 4 September 2021 (UTC)