Talk:Superman: Ultimate Flight/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 23:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
- Thanks very much for the review. Themeparkgc Talk 23:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]"The ride at Six Flags Great America ultimately opened on May 3, 2003" - Is the word "ultimately" really needed?--Dom497 (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Removed Themeparkgc Talk 06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
"The 2003 versions differ slightly from the original in Georgia; however, the majority of the layout remains the same." - Should this really be in the 'History' section? Sounds more suitable for the 'Characteristic' section as it already is so maybe just remove this statement?.-Dom497 (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Removed Themeparkgc Talk 06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Ref 17 is redirecting.--Dom497 (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
"...the on-ride camera photographs them." - Ref?--Dom497 (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Removed Themeparkgc Talk 06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Any awards? I would check but I got no time (I know, it sounds like an excuse but its not).--Dom497 (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
- Working Themeparkgc Talk 06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Done I don't think it won any awards as such but I have added some rankings from the Golden Ticket Awards and Best Roller Coaster Poll. Themeparkgc Talk 06:44, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Working Themeparkgc Talk 06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Just a small pet peeve of mine...in the ref section, some have it dd-mm-yyyy while others have mm-dd-yyyy. Maybe pick one format to make them consistent?--Dom497 (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Does there really have to be external links to RCDB when they are already refs?--Dom497 (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think the duplication of the links certainly serves a purpose here. I think it helps supplement having just three official websites there and provides a bit more balance. Themeparkgc Talk 04:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Fair enough.--Dom497 (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- I think the duplication of the links certainly serves a purpose here. I think it helps supplement having just three official websites there and provides a bit more balance. Themeparkgc Talk 04:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- This is more of a question from me to you as it was brought up in the SheiKra FA review: Should the Amusement Today refs use the cite journal template rather than the cite web?--Dom497 (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
- Since Amusement Today is a periodical, then it should use cite journal, shouldn't it? The article currently uses this template. Themeparkgc Talk 04:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Makes sense. Wasn't really part of this review, just a question I had for you. :P --Dom497 (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Since Amusement Today is a periodical, then it should use cite journal, shouldn't it? The article currently uses this template. Themeparkgc Talk 04:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
This should be it. Good job!.--Dom497 (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)