Talk:Superman: Ultimate Flight

Superman: Ultimate Flight has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 19, 2013	Guild of Copy Editors	Copyedited
May 21, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

Current status: Good article

Amusement Parks: Six Flags / Roller Coasters Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Amusement Parks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Amusement parks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Amusement ParksWikipedia:WikiProject Amusement ParksTemplate:WikiProject Amusement Parksamusement park articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Six Flags task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by Roller Coasters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Comics: Superman Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Superman work group.

Copyedit

This is just to say that I've tried to fill a request for a copyedit filed on the WP:GOCE/REQ page. Also, a couple of observations/suggestions:

The "Ride layout" section is a bit confusing -- probably because it's not easy to describe the experience of a roller coaster in words. The two pictures in that section help considerably, but someone more familiar with the ride may be able to clarify the words a bit more. That section is rather heavy with roller coaster jargon.
In the "Characterstics" section, it says that one version of the ride takes 3 minutes instead of 2 -- but it's only a few feet longer. How is that possible?
Should this article be in American or British English? I mean, the design company is European, but the rides themselves are in the United States.

Best of luck on an eventual GAN. Bobnorwal (talk) 01:53, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. I've clarified the ride's duration with different sources so now it is more realistic. Also, the article should feature American spelling so I fixed one instance (if there are more that I've missed, please feel free to make those corrections). Finally, I will endeavour to make the ride layout section less confusing for those not familiar with the jargon. Themeparkgc Talk 22:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Superman: Ultimate Flight/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 23:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. Has an appropriate reference section:

B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:
Pass!--Dom497 (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for the review. Themeparkgc Talk 23:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

~~"The ride at Six Flags Great America ultimately opened on May 3, 2003" - Is the word "ultimately" really needed?--Dom497 (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

Removed Themeparkgc Talk 06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The 2003 versions differ slightly from the original in Georgia; however, the majority of the layout remains the same." - Should this really be in the 'History' section? Sounds more suitable for the 'Characteristic' section as it already is so maybe just remove this statement?.-Dom497 (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed Themeparkgc Talk 06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Ref 17 is redirecting.--Dom497 (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

Fixed Themeparkgc Talk 06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~"...the on-ride camera photographs them." - Ref?--Dom497 (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

Removed Themeparkgc Talk 06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Any awards? I would check but I got no time (I know, it sounds like an excuse but its not).--Dom497 (talk) 23:46, 19 May 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

Working Themeparkgc Talk 06:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done I don't think it won any awards as such but I have added some rankings from the Golden Ticket Awards and Best Roller Coaster Poll. Themeparkgc Talk 06:44, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just a small pet peeve of mine...in the ref section, some have it dd-mm-yyyy while others have mm-dd-yyyy. Maybe pick one format to make them consistent?--Dom497 (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Themeparkgc Talk 04:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~Does there really have to be external links to RCDB when they are already refs?--Dom497 (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)~~[reply]

I think the duplication of the links certainly serves a purpose here. I think it helps supplement having just three official websites there and provides a bit more balance. Themeparkgc Talk 04:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough.--Dom497 (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is more of a question from me to you as it was brought up in the SheiKra FA review: Should the Amusement Today refs use the cite journal template rather than the cite web?--Dom497 (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since Amusement Today is a periodical, then it should use cite journal, shouldn't it? The article currently uses this template. Themeparkgc Talk 04:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. Wasn't really part of this review, just a question I had for you. :P --Dom497 (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This should be it. Good job!.--Dom497 (talk) 17:16, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Superman: Ultimate Flight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Superman: Ultimate Flight. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:20, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]