Jump to content

Talk:Superfiring

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Is the Fuso the best example of a combined superfiring and non-superfiring arrangement?

[edit]

Seems to me there might be a simpler ship to use which doesn't have the additional complication of funnel and/or tower placement. Also, if we're going to use the British turret naming scheme for a Japanese ship (which is defensible, since it's also the most popular scheme generally), the non-superfiring turrets would be P and Q, not "Z" (there is never a Z turret). Q is possibly superfiring although blocked by a tower; P does not appear to be. Ryan (talk) 03:36, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 December 2014

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Number 57 23:42, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


SuperfireSuperfiring – Per WP:TITLEFORMAT, rename to the gerund form as Superfiring or Superfiring turret Andy Dingley (talk) 13:52, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.