This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is almost entirely a long, long list of productions in which Super Subbarayan had some role (actor, stunt director, figher, etc). There is very little prose comparatively. In light of WP:NOTDIRECTORY, which says that Wikipedia is not "Simple listings without contextual information showing encyclopedic merit", I think this article needs to be pared back significantly. I think the article needs to have more prose that highlights the awards received and why the roles were worthy of recognition. If there are reliable sources that help to put his career in context, those would be helpful to use. As prolific as he has been I would hope there is "significant coverage" and not just passing mentions in reliable source(s). I would also remove most of the list of productions unless they are cited explicitly in the prose. It would not be appropriate to convert the bulleted lists into lists in the prose without context. If a production has a published reliable source that can be cited to show why his role in that production was noteworthy, then that would be a candidate for inclusion in the prose and/or a list. I invite editors to comment here on this proposal. Thanks. — Archer1234 (t·c) 23:41, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]