Talk:Sunbeam side-valve aircraft engines

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft engine task force.

Undoing re-direct

OK,you have undone the re-direct. Points:- 1. all the main article links point to the Crusader article 2. all the side-valve engines were directly related to the 110hp / Crusader 3. All the relevant info in this article is either already in the Crusader article or can very easily be added Do you have anyevidence why the re-direct should not be re-instated?Petebutt (talk) 16:40, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per the edit summary, these are a series of developments of the same engine, not independent developments. Although we should have the individual engine articles you've been working on, there's still scope for an overall one - especially as we already have it. The individual articles should (and can) expand from being redirects. The likelihood is that they'll not be big articles, being a stats table that duplicates the other article and also an "aircraft using" list, but that's still a sufficient scope to have them. Andy Dingley (talk) 17:33, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So on one hand you're desperate to get rid of an article on a series of engines that were related, yet on the other you've now made an undiscussed redirect of Sunbeam Matabele to the article on the Cossack, a whole different engine. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]