Talk:Sumdorong Chu standoff

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Asian / Chinese / Indian / South Asia Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Chinese military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force

Neutrality

SOmebody put a neutrality tag, but did not list reasons why. This is unhelpful. I would agree the article seems written from an Indian perspective, but it would be helpful to hear Chinese objections to the current version. Basejumper 14:58, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

There are few reliable offical sources about this conflict. Very hard to say which side was winning. Many sources cited from this wikipedia (please check their dates and web caches).

Especially for the casualties, reliable references are needed. Hope people keep their neutral mind!

Please offer reliable sources from ALL Indian, Chinese and English sources. (Alex Kuper (talk) 22:13, 13 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.indiatodaygroup.com/itoday/18051998/cover.html
- In 1987 Sino-Indian skirmish on 2011-05-25 05:40:06, 404 Not Found
- In 1987 Sino-Indian skirmish on 2011-06-24 07:07:29, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:07, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://www.indiatodaygroup.com/itoday/22021999/obit.html
- In 1987 Sino-Indian skirmish on 2011-05-25 05:40:06, 404 Not Found
- In 1987 Sino-Indian skirmish on 2011-06-24 07:07:39, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 07:07, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of Operation Chequerboard into Sumdorong Chu standoff

Operation Chequerboard was conducted because of and amidst the Sumdorong Chu standoff. DTM (talk) 12:14, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - The Chequerboard page is too vague. These military operations generally are. All the newspaper men sound like Sundarji fanboys. A straight merge would damage the quality of this page. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 23:36, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support merge on the grounds of both short text and context. I also note that policy is not to keep POVFORKs separate. Klbrain (talk) 11:02, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Given that no objection to that policy-based argument over 5 months, acting somewhat boldly,

Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 19:16, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]