Talk:Sumarr and Vetr/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

While a smallish subject, the coverage seems comprehensive, and is well-written and appropriately sourced. I see no reason whatsoever why this should not pass.

I'm taking the following on faith:

No relevant references are known outside of the Eddas
Vindsvalr and Svásuðr have no further known information than what is given here.

From my basic knowledge of Norse myth, these seem likely to be true, hence, pass. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 01:27, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You are correct about the personifications, as otherwise the connection is not evident and can only be theorized on (as strong as some of these theories may be). Vindsvalr and Svásuðr probably deserve their own articles for any further treatment, as more could be said (though not much) and this is the only source that connects directly with their children. :bloodofox: (talk) 08:43, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest adding a little bit about Vindsvalr and Svásuðr in here - when there's only a small amount that can be said, "on-topic" stretches a bit further =) Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 09:09, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]