Talk:Suizen

Japan: Religion Low‑importance

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 13:50, November 11, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related articles

Low

This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This redirect is supported by the Religion task force.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Ninja

Any sentence including the word "ninja" that remains uncited for that long needs to be removed on sight: it is done. Leushenko (talk) 19:42, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

aha, your sentence contains the word "ninja" without a citation (how do i know you really said this), so i will--wait, this sentence contains the word "ninja" withou...Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:57, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Torsten Olafsson

This page and a few other pages have been edited by a person named Torsten Mukuteki Olafsson. Mr. Olafsson continues to harass and abuse members of the international shakuhachi community and promote a heavily evangelical christian message about this flute from Japan. This is widely accepted in the Ethnomusicology sphere to be nothing more than bitter posturing. It is not the work of someone who wants to protect the truth about this music only grind his axe and rally against a group he feels slighted by. The tone of his additions are confrontational when they should be neutral. Out of respect for the practitioners of this instrument in Japan and outside of it it does no one reading this page any service to see the contributions he is adding. A wikipedia article for Shakuhachi and the musical history that goes along with it should not depend upon the writings of one fringe academic. If Mr. Olafsson would like to make a page specifically about his theories he would be well within his rights to do so while keeping in mind the rules of wikipedia.
Furthermore Mr. Olafsson has been working to promote another fringe individual. An American in Japan, himself a radical Christian. Mr. Olafsson's work on these pages works to disenfranchise shakuhachi teachers around the world in an effort to funnel studnets (thus money) to this person. The American in question believes that he has a monopoly on shakuhachi teaching and perfroming that was granted to him by God claiming that he is the best shakuhachi player and teacher in the world and citing his Youtube following as "gospel truth" of this. It is embarrassing to the shakuhachi community to have these be the representations of this tradition when in fact they are fringe beliefs held by grifters and their lackeys.

Sincerely,

ShakuhachiEnjoyer ShakuhachiEnjoyer (talk) 20:02, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Whether or not the views embarrass the shakuhachi community isn't important here, what is important is verifiability and reliable sources. Olafsson's personal religion also shouldn't have any bearing but the website likely doesn't meet WP:RS as it is self-published and only Olafsson's own views. ThaddeusSholto (talk) 22:28, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! As a musician and not an academic or a monk this is really helpful advice. Admittedly I should study the editing process here more. This page will gleam soon enough. ShakuhachiEnjoyer (talk) 22:54, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is now almost solely based on articles from "The Annals of the International Shakuhachi Society - Volume 1"; how reliable is that source? ? Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 06:29, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Annals is a published collection of multiple scholars works including PhD writings. It's a much better source than the other website. ShakuhachiEnjoyer (talk) 14:33, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I've merged this page to Fuke-shū; it's a marginal topic, and there's no need to have two separate articles. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 07:04, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]