Talk:Sue Golding
Appearance
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Problems
[edit]This sentence is problematic:
A major figure in queer activism and its theorisation (especially when she lived in Canada and worked alongside Michel Foucault), Golding is today most directly concerned with how to think a fractal philosophy.
- - "A major figure..." needs sourcing,
- - "especially when she lived in Canada and worked alongside Michel Foucault" needs sourcing and an explanation how how you can "work alongside" Foucault in Toronto,
- - "fractal philosophy" is not a standard term, so requires explanation. And the sentence that follows doesn't help, since fractals have zero do to with Gödel or metamathematics, and essentially zero to do with quantum mechanics.
Consequently I have re-removed this sentence. Feel free to re-add this information if it can be added in a well-sourced and coherent fashion.Hairhorn (talk) 19:44, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
This seems to be a vanity page. Is this person really noteworthy enough to merit a Wikipedia page?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 31.104.250.250 (talk • contribs)
Categories:
- Articles with connected contributors
- Biography articles of living people
- Stub-Class biography articles
- Stub-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Stub-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- Stub-Class philosopher articles
- Low-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles