Talk:Study Club fire
Appearance
A fact from Study Club fire appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 April 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
will add info from here tmmrw [1]Ottawa4ever (talk) 20:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Propose deleting Aftermath section
[edit]There's really nothing here to do with the aftermath. A reference in a 1971 safety manual seems a desperate stretch, and noting that there are not many reliable sources of information violates WP:OR. An institution categorizing damage as "significant" doesn't really count as aftermath. It's just a description, and a vague one. Any opposition to deletion? InedibleHulk (talk) 18:11, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- opposed The NFPA description is just fine as an aftermath to add some significance without stretch, you can look for other sources if you want to improve the section; rather than deleting it. Ottawa4ever (talk) 12:44, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- No, I'll just leave it alone. It isn't a big deal to me, one way or another. If nobody had objected, I'd have deleted it, but that's why I asked. InedibleHulk (talk) 13:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
[edit]There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ozone Disco fire which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)