Talk:Structural Awards

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCE articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Request: Add additional criteria to Intro

What are the criteria for this award? It seems to grant recognition to structures built in Anglo-Saxon countries or by Anglo-Saxon architects, with only the smallest number of exceptions. Something needs to be added to the intro of this article to state a few more of the rules by which structures are judged, or to discuss the obvious biases. --- (NB: How could Norman Foster's soaring Millau Viaduct be overlooked in 2004, but that ugly and inelegant engineering disaster called the West Gate Bridge in Australia get the 2012 award? -- I've seen both in person. -- It just seems strange to me.) Charvex (talk) 23:21, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

TorreIntesaSanPaolo2014.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:41, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]