Talk:Stout Scarab

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Michigan: Detroit Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Untitled

Um, how can we consider this the first production minivan if only 9 were produced? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.17.235.81 (talk) 23:36, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Besides the low "production" numbers the Scarab is not a minivan if we take the Chrysler Caravan as the segment definer. It doesn't have many of the key minivan features, derived from extensive consumer research, that made the minivan a success. Lacking are: Lift gate (or any rear access at all for that matter), sliding side door for child safety and ability to haul stuff like sofas and large boxes. Also a key packaging concern of the minivan was it fit in vast majority of garages. I can't find specifications on the Scarab but I doubt the standard garagebility of a vehicle with a 135" wheel base (compare to the Caravan's 112" wheelbase) and a rear seat 6' wide. Especially considering the average garage at the time was Model T (wheelbase 100") sized. Mitheral (talk) 10:00, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disastrous Edit

By altering a few words a paragraph was destroyed and a long, long sentence runs right off the page. I've tried to fix this but have had no luck so I'll leave it to someone who actually knows what they're doing. I tried Undoing the edit but for some reason that wasn't allowed (although generally it is simply a click of the undo in the history!). Specifically, the edit was supposed to make the article more neutral and really eliminated two or three words. I didn't expect it to create this havoc! 75.48.23.112 (talk) 03:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I fixed it! 75.48.23.112 (talk) 03:03, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Stout Scarab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20051213022446/http://miscfug.blogspot.com:80/ to http://miscfug.blogspot.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:40, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To those that feel more comfortable editing the text and references on Wikipedia:

I used the link to the article citing a newspaper article on a person owning a Scarab. When I clicked the link to the Fayeteville Observer the website returned a page not found. I did a search and found the correct link to be ^[1] 2602:306:3B2A:F6D0:40A:F908:8D8B:6D7F (talk) 06:08, 5 October 2016 (UTC)Ron Myers[reply]

Fixed, thanks for the pointer. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:20, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://www.fayobserver.com/news/local/ever-hear-of-the-scarab/article_8f2e8d63-43d7-5af3-9ba3-5405a964d063.html

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stout Scarab. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017233658/http://www.indiacar.com/infobank/stout.htm to http://www.indiacar.com/infobank/stout.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:32, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttp://www.fayobserver.com/news/local/ever-hear-of-the-scarab/article_8f2e8d63-43d7-5af3-9ba3-5405a964d063.html

[1]