This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Country music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to country music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Country musicWikipedia:WikiProject Country musicTemplate:WikiProject Country musicCountry music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
There's really no point in specifying in the infobox Robert Deaton is also an executive producer on the project when he's already a producer anyway. What do we gain from denoting that the main producer is also an executive producer when WP:NOEXEC tells us this role isn't important? WP:NOEXEC states we can still list people who are only executive producers if their role is substantially the same as a producer, but nothing about needing to specify that they are an executive producer (either or only). Not that this really applies to Deaton anyway, but if an executive producer had much the same function as an ordinary producer, there'd be no need to specify in the infobox that they're an executive one because they basically acted like a producer anyway. Leave such specifications for the body of the article and/or the personnel section. I note that there currently is no mention elsewhere of his executive role yet this is apparently so important it needed to be restored to the infobox... Ss11206:52, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
