This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Am I alone in thinking the accounting they've done over the years isn't that interesting? $100,000,000 here, another few million there. It barely qualifies as "history", what in this section sets them apart from any other start-up? It reads like an overly enthusiastic blog. 2A02:C7C:D5F6:A300:E4A0:6532:6E3B:2EF5 (talk) 11:26, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Funding history is pretty commonly included in articles for startups, especially younger startups with no revenue. The paragraph for the Series A round could probably be condensed though. StereoFolic (talk) 13:59, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, it could be condensed, as their funding isn't too important regarding the technologies the company is developing, probably good to talk about their social media presence and their recent tests. TeeboTibo (talk) 14:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]