Jump to content

Talk:Steve Womack

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discussion of mayoralty

[edit]

@Bjoh249: this year you've removed nearly the entire discussion of Womack's mayoralty four times, with no proper explanation:

  1. January 5, 2024: "This entry sounds very biased"
  2. May 6, 2024: no edit summary
  3. August 8, 2024: no edit summary
  4. October 27, 2024: "irrelevant and biased info"

What exactly in this section is "biased?" I see a straightforward discussion of a major event in the mayor's term, which led to two articles in national publications (Fox News Latino and Newsweek). Reliable sources have covered this part of his career, so I see no reason for its removal. Dan Leonard (talk • contribs) 07:24, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s irrelevant and biased. None of the good works he has done is mentioned. Never mind all the progress that Rogers, Ar has made as one of the fastest growing cities in the country. But I’m not going to revert your bias article again. You win. No wonder hardly anybody takes Wikipedia seriously.Bjoh249 (talk) 23:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]