Talk:Stepney City Farm

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stepney City Farm article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 2 January 2013 by reviewer Avs5221 (talk · contribs).

Agriculture: Livestock Low‑importance

	Agriculture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Agriculture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of agriculture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AgricultureWikipedia:WikiProject AgricultureTemplate:WikiProject AgricultureAgriculture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Livestock task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comments

--S Philbrick (Talk) 19:05, 20 January 2014 (UTC)== Cleanup ==[reply]

This article is quite a mess, with editorial issues, content issues, and wikitext issues. There are bare url's, along with extensive discussion of what appears to be a minor issue. As someone who has worked on a farm, and had to put down cows, it is an extremely common occurrence, and hardly deserves the breathless coverage.

Editors need to understand that mentions in Reliable sources are a necessary, but not a sufficient rationale for inclusion. Not everything printed in every newspaper should be copied over, or Wikipedia would be nothing more than a mirror of the standard media.

I'm going to start a cleanup, please feel free to comment here if you think I'm missing why this minor event deserves more coverage.--S Philbrick (Talk) 23:01, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Far too much coverage is given to a relatively minor event in this farm's history. The farm was no longer able to justify keeping a cow and a bull, looked into moving them elsewhere, but in what should be a different story about bureaucracy gone amok, was unable to move them so they were put down. That event comprises almost a third of the article, far more than it deserves. I opened up a discussion to see if editors would comment on how it should be handled, but no one has responded, so I am going to cut it down. Frankly, I'm not sure it deserves more than a sentence, or possibly even that much, but I'll make a caution cut and see how it goes.

Specific cleanup

The writing is abysmal. I'm trying to do some cleanup, but in some cases, it isn't easy. For example, this sentence:

The site has been through several incarnations since the 17th century.

"Incarnations" is clearly wrong (and not in source. I haven't yet identified a better word, partly because I'm not sure what is meant. Multiple owners? Changes in operation? Physical changes?--S Philbrick (Talk) 23:20, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

recent edit

The inclusion of the statement that the cows were killed without warning leaves the impression that a warning was expected. Nothing supports this notion. Cows are killed without warning every day. That doesn't make it of encyclopedic interest.

I'll also note that the talk page is the place to discuss potentially contentious issues. If someone thinks some of the removed items are deserving of inclusion, please make your case here.--S Philbrick (Talk) 19:54, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Characterizing the existence of a "slaughter policy" as significant is not supported by the reference. Furthermore, it sounds like an OR view of someone unfamiliar with standard farm policy. It would be sort of like editing the article about London every time they decide to add a traffic light.--S Philbrick (Talk) 20:02, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Updates

Some updating is needed - there should be more recent financial accounts, and probably the Crossrail section, while the cattle are variously described as 'a bull and a cow' and 'cows.' Jackiespeel (talk) 10:52, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]