Talk:States and union territories of India/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about States and union territories of India. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
2006 discussion
changes by Alokchakrabarti:
I have reverted the changes since the context of the spellings is imp here. French India knew the places by their colonial names, and hence they should be directed to the resp page. Reverting to the original Indian names only subverts the historical context.
Pizzadeliveryboy 19:59, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
Delhi should be included in the list of Union Territories. There is no such thing called a National Capital Territory. There are only states and union territories. It is incorrect to say that Delhi is no longer a Union Territory. Delhi still has an entry in the First Schedule, Part II of the Constitution of India (Union Territories).
"1. Delhi...The territory which immediately before the commencement of this Constitution was comprised in the Chief Commissioner’s Province of Delhi."
What the Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi Act, 1991 did was to change the name of the territory (besides introducing an elected assembly, etc.), it did not change the classification of the territory. Under the Constitution (Article I, Section 3):
"(3) The territory of India shall comprise— (a) the territories of the States; (b) the Union territories specified in the First Schedule; and (c) such other territories as may be acquired."
Delhi is neither (a) or (c).
Also, Article 239AA of the Constitution says:
himachal is the best part of india —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.173.157.181 (talk) 10:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
"239AA. Special provisions with respect to Delhi.—(1) As from the date of commencement of the Constitution (Sixty-ninth Amendment) Act, 1991, the Union territory of Delhi shall be called the National Capital Territory of Delhi (hereafter in this Part referred to as the National Capital Territory) and the administrator thereof appointed under article 239 shall be designated as the Lieutenant Governor." (emphasis added)
This substantiates my claim that only the name was changed, not the classification.
So the correct way to refer to Delhi would be:
National Capital Territory of Delhi
or
Delhi (National Capital Territory)
--Manojb 03:52, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
One thing seems clear -- Delhi should be listed as "G" and not as "F". The alphabetization has led to switching it with Pondicherry.
--Major Danby 18 Feb 2006
Map
What's the deal with the map? There used to be a very clear one, but it seems to have been replaced by that bizarre one we have now. Anyone know what the story is? john k 19:13, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- No idea, but I have now replaced the colourless map with a clearer one here. //Big Adamsky 19:33, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
- Good job, thanks. john k 07:29, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
The map is really really nice. Wachholder0 01:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Jammu and kashmir is shown as Chinese territory claimed by India and Pakistan territory claimed by India, which should be changed as Indian territory claimed by Pakistan and China. And Arunachal Pradesh is a part of India which is claimed by China that should be mentioned clearly — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunkumar6886 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Union territory vs state
New Delhi is now the capital of the State of Delhi. It is no longer a union administered territory and has its own legislative assembly.
This is true. Delhi is neither a state or an union territory, though it has special state rights(they elect their own legislatures). Hence the correct division is 28 states and 6 UT's and 1 NCT Gamesmaster G-9 19:19, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
- r u sure abt it?? R there any reliables srcs? --Aravind
- That is, indeed, simply wrong. —Nightstallion (?) 09:29, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
New delhi is definitely a state. It has a state assembly, which has elections. Sheila Dixit is the first mister of the state of Delhi. I am not sure that is the case with Pondicherry (Puducherry) - Mowgli
- It's still officially a union territory, full stop. —Nightstallion (?) 16:10, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
DELHI IS NO LONGER A UNION TERITORY, IT BACAME A STATE ABOUT 16 YEARS BACK AT THE TIME OF BJP RULE AT CENTER.MADAN LAL KHURANA WAS THE FIRST CHIEF MINISTER AFTER THAT SHEILA DIXIT IS CM FOR CONSEQUITIVE 3RD 5 YEAR TERM.
PONDICHERRY IS ALSO A STATE NOW.
WE HAVE 30 STATES AND 5 UTS AT PRESENT. PLEASE CORRECT THE INFORMATION
Delhi can still be counted as one of the union territories as per the information in the Government of India website.[1]
List of Indian states
Hi. I am making a list of Indian states ranked based on several criteria based on the NFHS-3 survey published on the website http://www.nfhsindia.org/factsheet.html. I think it makes some sense to give links to those lists from this article...I would like to know the opinion of you guys....Fair and Honest_India —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vcpkumar (talk • contribs) 19:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- I've brought up the question of these articles at Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. You're welcome to participate in the discussion there. Thanks. - BillCJ (talk) 19:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Powers and authority of states and territories
The article is very good on the history and rationale behind the development of the states of India. However it tells the outside reader nothing of what they actually are. For example, neither this article nor Administrative divisions of India says what the powers are vested in a state and what is reserved to the Union Parliament.
What legislative and administrative compentence do the states have? To what extent may the Union Parliamnet override the state's decisions, or suspend the state's constitution (as has happened on a number of occasions in the past)? Are the powers of the states defined by the constitution or by the will of Parliament? How are the States governed?
A good comparison would be with States and territories of Australia or Provinces and territories of Canada.
Howard Alexander (talk) 08:15, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
- I concur. I happened by this article and was unable to learn what sort of federalism India might or might not practice, de jure or de facto. Is their any sort of idea of limited sovereignty in Indian political economy? Many questions remaining. Would be very helpful if a political science expert would help out.N2e (talk) 12:29, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
- I have stubbed out a section heading where we can being to collect comparative information on the responsibilities and authorities of the states/territories relative to those of the national government. We could really use the help of an expert on Indian government theory and practice to help out here. N2e (talk) 23:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
Developing Updates
According to Time Magazine there may be some new states forming. [2] @Discover10 01:17, 14 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Discover10 (talk • contribs)
- Yes!But, the formation of the new state is in a process. We can observe the information regarding this in the sub-page:Late 2009 of the article.So, please don't tag the article with 'Update template' without any relevance.--SharadbobTalkC 09:07, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
Table
Based on the one @ U.S. state. With a bit of editing might be worth including... Take it or leave it
# | Name | Pop | Capital | Largest city |
---|---|---|---|---|
A | Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 356,152 | Port Blair | Port Blair |
B | Chandigarh | 900,635 | Chandigarh | Chandigarh |
C | Dadra and Nagar Haveli | 220,451 | Silvassa | |
D | Daman and Diu | 220,451 | Daman | |
E | Lakshadweep | 60,595 | Kavaratti | Andrott |
F | National Capital Territory of Delhi | 13,782,976 | Delhi | Delhi |
G | Puducherry | 973,829 | Puducherry | Puducherry |
41.247.46.157 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC).
- This table is highly very well done with! I have some suggestions that we could implement:
- We can have the codes of the states as in ISO 3166-2:IN.
- We could also have the number of districts, in each of the states, displayed.
- And also the date of formation of each of the states.
- And vitally we need the references for the relevance of all the above.--SharadbobTalkC 14:29, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Seconded, great overview. Seems that the least we could do is add numbers to the table, so the main table will be easier to relate to the map (image on the right) that shows numbers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.166.235.101 (talk) 16:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Better sources for Powers and authority of states and territories?
Does anyone have good sources for improving the States and territories of India article in the area of of the relative powers and authority of states and territories? As noted above on this Talk page, the current article has no information about the "history and rationale behind the development of the states of India. ... it tells the reader nothing of what they actually are. For example, neither [that] article nor Administrative divisions of India says what the powers are vested in a state and what is reserved to the Union Parliament." I have made an initial attempt to stub out an first cut on the relative responsibilities and authorities of the states compared to the national government in this section.
Does anyone know where we might find some online source with this info? Thanks. N2e (talk) 19:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Hey N2e! The primary source for this kind of information would be in the Constitution itself, although of course those things are never fun to read, and India happens to have the longest of them all. I certainly haven't read the whole thing, but I can point out the parts that would be relevant. Articles 80-81 outline the basis for representation of each of the states at the Union level. Apart from that, Parts 6, 8 and (especially) 11 would definitely be important to read over for the basics. And there's also the special provisions outlined in Articles 370-371 which would be very important to mention, as some states get more autonomy than others. You can get the full text here.
- If you're looking for a basic outline to go by, I came across this, which sources its information. But I don't really have any specific online sources that would go into much detail, unless you want analytical or critical essays on the the federal system in India. I could recommend some good books, but none of them are available for preview on Google or anything.
- One thing that I'm not sure is mentioned in the constitution is that because it was each individual princely state that acceded to the Union—and in most cases under no terms of accession—the current states as they stand, which were created through reorganisation in 1956, have no legal right to secede from the federation, as is the case in most federal unions.
- If I can be of any further help, just let me know. Night w (talk) 13:58, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Night w! Those will be most useful sources for looking into. One other thing. I think it would be helpful if you would go ahead and mention one or a few of the books you are aware of. Even though they are not available online, perhaps an editor interested in this article would have one of them in hardcopy, or be able to obtain a copy from the library. N2e (talk) 14:59, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Federalism in India by Asok Chanda, Indian Federalism by Venkatarangaiya and Shiviah, and Inter-governmental Relations in India by Amal Ray. These are all good commentaries on the Constitution. Also, any kind of comparative study of federal systems that mentions the Indian model might help, although I don't know of any specific titles. I think it's probably important to have at least one supplementary source in order to back up any editor's explanation of the Constitution. I'll have a look at my library for something next time I'm there. Night w (talk) 05:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Pending changes
This article is one of a number selected for the early stage of the trial of the Wikipedia:Pending Changes system on the English language Wikipedia. All the articles listed at Wikipedia:Pending changes/Queue are being considered for level 1 pending changes protection.
The following request appears on that page:
Many of the articles were selected semi-automatically from a list of indefinitely semi-protected articles. Please confirm that the protection level appears to be still warranted, and consider unprotecting instead, before applying pending changes protection to the article. |
Comments on the suitability of theis page for "Pending changes" would be appreciated.
Please update the Queue page as appropriate.
Note that I am not involved in this project any much more than any other editor, just posting these notes since it is quite a big change, potentially
Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 00:10, 17 June 2010 (UTC).
Oops!
My reverting Elockid's edit was simply a case of repeatedly clicking at the non-responsive Chrome. It was not done intentionally. Thanks.Shovon (talk) 15:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
Edit request from 203.99.197.54, 9 June 2011
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
please remove Telugu from the language list of Tamil Nadu state because Tamil is the only language of Tamil Nadu State and you can verify it in the government of india website's Tamil Nadu page. The link is http://india.gov.in/knowindia/st_tamilnadu.php. telugu is nowhere used in Tamil Nadu.
203.99.197.54 (talk) 09:36, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
- Not done. Tamil Nadu, which cites the 1991 census, disagrees. The reference you give doesn't say that the language isn't spoken, and doesn't mention any of the other minority languages either. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 16:42, 9 June 2011 (UTC)
Edit request from Perkrocks, 10 August 2011
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the literacy rate of Kerala from 93.91% on this page to 94.59% as verified by the other wikipedia page of kerala. Or by googling literacy rate of kerala the first page that shows up as wikipedia contains the data as 94.59%. Best Regards
Perkrocks (talk) 06:33, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
- Not done: Wikipedia should not be used to cite itself. Topher385 (talk) 13:38, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Edit request from Saradindu123, 15 September 2011
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please update the no of districts for each states in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/States_and_territories_of_India. Examples are following:
1)Assam - should be 27 2)West Bengal - should be 19
Saradindu123 (talk) 10:18, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
Not a federal republic
Indian constitution explicitly states India is a union of states. Though it shares some aspects of a federal form of govt., it cannot be described as a federal republic.-Bharatveer (talk) 06:37, 3 September 2008 (UTC) India is a unitary state. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.134.224.234 (talk) 06:16, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Map
It is now absolutely unclear what states correspond to what number on the map. Can anybody either change the map in a way that it is clear or add the numbers that correspond to the map to the table?--Merijn2 (talk) 18:20, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
Edit request on 6 March 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Tamil Nadu Districts Total are 32
117.204.22.185 (talk) 14:15, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
- Done Thank you for bringing this to notice. — Abhishek Talk 14:24, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 16 May 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change Pondicherry to Puducherri. 117.199.38.242 (talk) 11:21, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
- Pondicherry is the common English name. CMD (talk) 11:43, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
How the ISO-3266-2 Code for the State of Chhattisgarh (item serial number 5 in the Table), is indicated as " CT " , when it should be actually " CG " instead ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.193.2.168 (talk) 00:21, 26 July 2012 (UTC) It may due due to a typo error. The letters (alphabets) 'G' and 'T' are close by. Also, the letters (alphabets) 'G' and 'H' are just adjacent to each other, which may explain why the two-letter code used for the State of Chhattisgarh is mentioned as 'CG' as well as 'CH' in different articles. One should note also that 'CH' actually stands for "Chandigarh" (Union Territory).--68.193.2.168 (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
Reg: Use of English in Goa, Tamil Nadu, and Pondicherry
Please add English in the list of languages for Goa, Tamil Nadu, and Pondicherry. English is also prominently spoken in Goa. English is the only other official language in TN, apart from Tamil. Hindi is not recognised as an official language in TN and neither is it spoken. Telugu, Malayalam, Gujarati, and Punjabi are not spoken either. English is also one of the languages used for official communication and documentation by the TN Govt. In Pondicherry too, English is also one of the languages used for official communication and documentation by the Govt. Please look up the respective websites for more information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.64.65.60 (talk) 12:09, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 14 August 2012 Factual Change
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Capital of National capital territory of Delhi is DELHI and NOT New Delhi. This can be verified at http://india.gov.in/knowindia/state_uts.php?id=32 Balajiop (talk) 19:25, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Done thanks for your contribution :) — Deontalk 09:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 30 August 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
111.93.170.66 (talk) 11:26, 30 August 2012 (UTC) Sir the name of Orissa is Changed to Odisha & Oriya to Odiya Plz make necessary corrections
- Not done: as Orissa/Oriya is the common name of the state/language. A boat that can float! (watch me float!) 12:45, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
- Update. This is now partly Done. Wikipedia has accepted that the common name for the state is now Odisha, but does not accept that the common name for the language has changed. Skinsmoke (talk) 16:47, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Languages
Hello. I notice that many states have English listed as an official language. However, I have not been able to find any credible evidence in that direction. Before I delete such occurences, I would like to find out if others have any inputs on this. Thank You Jash121 (talk) 00:03, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 20 November 2012
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Change "Inion" to "Union" in Reference 16 Stygian sentinel (talk) 00:01, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Done - with this edit. Thank you for pointing this out. Begoon talk 02:14, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
Mistakes
It is ISO 3166-2 code, not 3266-2. How come no one noticed? Please be careful. -Polytope4d (talk) 09:11, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 20 January 2013
|UL
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
ISO 3166-2:IN of Uttar Pradesh is UP, not UL or is it? Aɛɪouy (talk) 14:54, 27 January 2013 (UTC) Done In future, it would be helpful to simply describe what you'd like edited, as opposed to copying the whole article. :) Discuss-Dubious (t/c) 22:47, 27 January 2013 (UTC) I didn't copy the article, it was already there in the talk page, on whatever purpose. In future, look into history :P Aɛɪouy (talk) 13:16, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
Edit request on 29 May 2013
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Adding this file to this page would be helpful, in showing the history of the states before reorgnisation
File:India Administrative Divisions 1951.svg
Amalt995 (talk) 21:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC) Done Nice idea, I added it. Howicus (talk) 01:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- However, I couldn't get the formatting quite right with the image and the{{India divisions by}} template. It would look nicer to have the image first, and then the template but I can't figure it out. Howicus (talk) 01:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Edit request on 23 June 2013 - MAP
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change the map description It is mentioned as India occupied chinese and India occupied Pak territories, instead of this it should be mentioned as Pak occupied Indian territory and Chinese occupied Indian Territory Also keep the source for current statements 212.107.105.226 (talk) 11:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: please establish a consensus for this alteration before using the
{{edit semi-protected}}
template. If I understand correctly, these areas are under contention. RudolfRed (talk) 22:21, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Edit request on 30 June 2013
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
122.163.47.148 (talk) 04:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC) Dear Administrator/established user
for ease of nderstanding could you pls add/make a serial no. column in the list of states and union territories. it should state 1- 26 against the states and A to G so that viewers can easily see the location
hope i am clear
saket
saket000@yahoo.com
- Done. SiBr4 (talk) 11:34, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
Edit request on 31 July 2013
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I could notice the indian map, given in this article is completely a dreck. It can be replaced by, this link, " http://www.google.co.in/search?q=india&psj=1&bav=on.2,or.&bvm=bv.49967636,d.bmk,pv.xjs.s.en_US.jOYpRJj4zMA.O&biw=1280&bih=800&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=e7r4UeX4DMjwrQe_r4DoBw#biv=i%7C0%3Bd%7C5XJ0Winm8m5LoM%3A ". Also the number of states and their names are wrong, it is 29 states as of now. They are, jammu and kashmir, haryana, delhi, punjab, himachal pradesh, uttarakhand, rajasthan, gujarat,madhya pradesh, maharastra, uttar pradesh, bihar, chattisgarh, jharkhand, west bengal, odhisha, andra pradesh, karnataka, goa, tamil nadu, kerala, sikkim, meghalaya, mizoram, tripura, nagaland, manipur, assam, arunachal pradesh. 106.200.47.61 (talk) 07:39, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: See the MAP section above on declining the request for change in MAP. As for the states, Delhi is not state, its an Union territory. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 14:00, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:States and union territories of India/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Please update your information regarding the number of states. It should be 29 states instead of 28 states. Delhi is considered as a separate state which is not shown in your list.
Thanks & regards, Iftekhar Ahmed |
Substituted at 06:05, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
Edit request on 29 August 2013
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please Add The Information Of Telangana State, as
Area[1]
- Total 114,840 km2 (44,340 sq mi)
Population (2011)
- Total 35,286,757
- Density 310/km2 (800/sq mi)
Languages
- Official Telugu
Time zone IST (UTC+05:30)
Largest city Hyderabad
117.203.196.107 (talk) 12:38, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
- Not done: You forgot a piece of information:
- Date of officially becoming a state: Not yet...
- When it is, which is not likely to be for some time yet, then we can add it. Thanks. Begoon talk 14:26, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
Edit request on 4 October 2013
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Vinaychammy (talk) 14:37, 4 October 2013 (UTC) The Indian map shown in this page is incorrect! A large portion of Jammu and Kashmir which is originally occupied by Pakistan is actually labeled as 'Pakistan territory claimed by India' and the entire State of Arunachal Pradesh is shown as as 'Chinese territory claimed by India' which is totally incorrect! Please correct it!
- Not done: This map is used across articles in wikipedia. It is per long standing consensus. — Abhishek Talk 15:59, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
Edit request on 25 September 2013
Telangana the 29th state of India
"On July 30, 2013, the Congress Party, which leads the governing coalition of the central government, endorsed the creation of Telangana as the 29th state of India by dividing Andhra Pradesh. The decision culminated a 57-year-old troubled relationship between the two Telugu-speaking regions, which had been combined to form Andhra Pradesh."
- Great. Please inform us when it actually does become a state. CMD (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- You know - I think we may not have to worry too much, and someone, somewhere, probably will let us know when that happens, in case we forget - if not before it happens - again... It's just a feeling I have... Begoon talk 16:04, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- I think it's a copyvio. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:05, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 11 January 2014
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
In the proposals sub-section, I request someone to remove the first line i.e "Ahead of the 2009 General Elections in India, all the major parties in Andhra Pradesh supported statehood for Telangana. As a result of this unilateral decision by the Government of India, several members of Andhra Pradesh's legislature submitted their resignations to protest the creation of the new state owing to the pressure from the people in their constituencies." which is unsourced and instead of it add the following lines along with references from here: "On 9 December 2009 the Government of India announced process of formation of Telangana state. After Members of Legislative Assembly & Council from Coastal Andhra and Rayalaseema regions had submitted resignations in response to the announcement, as well as violent protests raised in those regions immediately after the announcement, the decision to form to new state was put on hold on 23 December 2009. The movement continued in Hyderabad and other districts of Telangana.".[4][5] Do the necessary modifications at your will. I am Jayadevp13 but since I am blocked per my own request I cannot possibly make those changes. Regards. - 117.199.189.185 (talk) 07:02, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
- ^ http://india.gov.in/knowindia/state_uts.php
- ^ http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1947392,00.html
- ^ Source
- ^ "Pro-Telangana AP govt employees threaten agitation". The Economic Times. 10 February 2012. Retrieved 18 February 2012.
- ^ Francesco Brunello Zanitti "Telangana issue sparks more turmoil". Asia Times Online. 19 October 2012.
- Not done:
{{edit semi-protected}}
is not required for edits to semi-protected, unprotected pages, or pending changes protected pages. Technical 13 (talk) 00:21, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Edit request on 21 August 2013
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
14.141.36.20 (talk) 11:36, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
Telangana is A state now so please add it to the list
- Not done, not yet. —SpacemanSpiff 14:23, 21 August 2013 (UTC)
not yet, wait till it becomes a state.--117.194.204.34 (talk) 03:49, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Adding Telangana
AP Re-organisation Bill is just passed but not in force. If only notified in Gazette of India, it will come to effect. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 11:21, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
Population density
What is the unit for population density -- people per sq km, or people per sq mile? Vedabit (talk) 06:11, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
- Per square kilometer. I have added it to the table column heading. Abecedare (talk) 21:08, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on States and union territories of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100704211703/http://india.gov.in:80/allimpfrms/allacts/474.pdf to http://india.gov.in/allimpfrms/allacts/474.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:19, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
date of formation of orrisa
a state was formed on april 1, 1912 known as the bihar and odisha province but on the same day in 1936 it was divided into bihar province and Odisha province and Odisha province was renamed Orissa sometime later. so which day should be taken for the formation of the state of Orissa?Apurvgupt (talk) 13:08, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on States and union territories of India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761571624/gupta_dynasty.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100704202817/http://cg.gov.in/profile/corigin.htm to http://cg.gov.in/profile/corigin.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160708012438/http://nclm.nic.in/shared/linkimages/NCLM50thReport.pdf to http://nclm.nic.in/shared/linkimages/NCLM50thReport.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
Why J&K was removed from list of states?
Vandalism? Please reinsert and protect it from the Online-Jihadi Pakis. Thanks. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 08:56, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
Improvement of map
The map at the top is not too good. Could we replace it with a much better one? Also, can the word "Jharkand" not be placed exactly across the border between Bihar and Jharkand? That is just confusing. 173.88.241.33 (talk) 23:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Make a better one and replace it. —Gazoth (talk) 23:59, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- @173.88.241.33: See if {{India States and Territories Labelled Map}} is an improvement over the previous version ? Abecedare (talk) 03:41, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- This map is much better and includes the capitals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:States_and_union_territories_of_India#/media/File:India_-_administrative_map.png Legacypac (talk) 01:03, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- Please use your map, go ahead. 222.164.212.168 (talk) 08:58, 30 June 2019 (UTC)
- This map is much better and includes the capitals https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:States_and_union_territories_of_India#/media/File:India_-_administrative_map.png Legacypac (talk) 01:03, 23 October 2018 (UTC)
- @173.88.241.33: See if {{India States and Territories Labelled Map}} is an improvement over the previous version ? Abecedare (talk) 03:41, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
A year later, the map still needs a lot of work. And when it is enlarged it has no text avaialble, which defeats the purpose of enlarging it. Is there any way the text of the map can be attached to the map? Stevenmitchell (talk) 01:09, 12 June 2019 (UTC)