Jump to content

Talk:State of the Union/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Older

I plan to make State of the Union a disambig page. It is also the name of a 1948 movie by Frank Capra. Jay 00:47, 15 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Done. Jay 04:26, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Since you made the diambiguation, please go to "what links here" at "State of the Union" and fix all the links directed there to link them to here instead. --Jiang 04:34, 23 Jan 2004 (UTC)

Since most pages pointing there were meant for here, I restored the redirect and created State of the Union (disambiguation) instead. Turns out there were several other possible meanings. --Minesweeper 12:36, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Notice of recent vandalism

I noticed today that the massage "skate for life..." was added to the top of this page. I was unable to delete it and I would simply like to mention it. (23 January 2006, 9:41 PM EST) 69.123.6.10 03:11, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

List of opposing speakers?

Should there be a list of opposing responses? --Blue387 07:35, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • no

What government officials were absent from the 2006 state of the union speech in order to protect the presidential line of succession?


Uhm I think there should be a list, rather than the vauge rambling paragraph about it that seems to suggest that Democrats do opposing responses more often than Republicans. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.174.110.147 (talk) 17:35, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Listing speakers in this section causes confusion and is ambiguous, as I cannot tell if there was an annual response every year after 1966, or if the only people rebutting are listed here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.26.72.214 (talk) 16:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Supreme Court Ovations?

Looks to me like some of the justices were standing & applauding during the speech. Isn't that against their rules? Aaronwinborn 02:27, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Seems like they don't applaud much. Perhaps they traditionally applaud only for vague ideals like democracy, God-bless-America etc. but not for policy related issues they might rule on.

They were applauding when Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was mentioned, but you are right, they normally do not applaud. There is not any "rule" but a matter of tradition to be impartial to policy and such.

They are only not allowed to applaud if it is to a political opinion.

add references to the address

1) can we import the speech to the wiki? (I mean legally, on grounds of copyright)

2) If so, can we get started on holding the president to book on some of his claims, referencing where neccessary, and creating a document to refer to at a later date for some of the future claims.

DavidMcKenzie 10:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your first item, it is my understanding that material produced by the US government and it's employees/officials are considered public domain.
I do think that there should be linkage provided to the SotU addresses, as well as the actual text, just to provide backup as well as convenience in research. Further information regarding the address could also be provided on that page, such as details about the presentation. Some seemingly trivial information can have unexpected consequences. For example, the SotU of 1964 was the last given during the day before the evening address of 1965. THe result was that a large audience tuned in to the commentary that night hosted by America's most trusted newsman, Walter Cronkite. The folks who stayed tuned to CBS afterwards contributed to that night's episode of The Beverly Hillbillies becoming the highest rated 30 minute American television episode in history. Kid Bugs (talk) 18:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

No requirement for SOTU

The article says, the requirement for the address is written into the United States Constitution.... Technically, that's not true. As quoted, the only requirement is that the President, give to Congress information of the State of the Union. It doesn't say it has to be an address. It could be a written report. He could send an email to speaker@house.congress.gov that says, "The country's great, ttyl" and meet the letter of the requirement. -- RoySmith (talk) 21:39, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Hee. I'd vote for the e-mail writing president just for saving me from having to listen to an hour-long speech. And for my own amusement, of course. ekedolphin 02:46, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
He'd probably have to CC all 435 Members of Congress (plus the nonvoting delegates representing the District of Columbia, Guam, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, and the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands), 100 Senators, plus VP Biden in his capacity as President of the Senate to really meet the requirements of Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution. And to be more accurate, the email address is (probably) speaker@house.gov. But it wouldn't surprise me if Nancy Pelosi and the rest have private email addresses for all Members to email one another directly. --MicahBrwn (talk) 20:47, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

The "well, duh!" sentence of the year award

Section 3, paragraph 5: 'Applause indicates support, while applause with a standing ovation indicates enthusiastic support.' Hee. As much as the sentence's obviousness amuses me, um, do we really need this sentence here? ekedolphin 02:45, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

It is a "duh" moment - but I do think that it is appropriate in this circumstance - as the degree of applause (applause by party, no applause as opposition, etc.) is mentioned. --Tim4christ17 03:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
I think it's silly. The same could be said of any speech anywhere. This is especially true for political speeches, regardless of where it takes place. Amount of applause indicates the level of support -- obviously. The same would hold true for a political speech in India, China, France, South Africa, etc. This isn't unique to the State of the Union address. Thus, there's no point in keeping the sentence. I'm removing it. ask123 (talk) 14:14, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
Someone beat me to it. Good thing... ask123 (talk) 14:15, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

State of the Union in Inauguration Years

The article does not make it clear how the address works in years in which a new president has just been sworn in. Presumably this is scheduled after the inauguration of the new president. Is he then to deliver an address on the State of the Union only days after being sworn in?

This page says that officially there are no State of the Union addresses in the inauguration year, but that the last 3 presidents have given speeches that have the same impact. Qutezuce 02:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

Last written SOTU

According to the Office of the Clerk, U.S. House of Representatives [2], Reagan gave a SOTU in writing in 1989, while, according to [3], he gave none that year. Who's right? It would impact the veracity of "The last President to do this was Jimmy Carter in 1981," as well as the reliability of the latter source page. Calbaer 00:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

1989 is an election year; in theory, no one gives a SOTU in 1989, and surely not the outgoing president.--Prosfilaes (talk) 16:05, 18 February 2009 (UTC)

Source re JCS applause?

Where's all the applause stuff come from? Any source? In particular re the Joint Chiefs. --Penta 19:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

First Evening Address

According to this article, "Lyndon Johnson's address in 1965 was the first delivered in the evening." But according to Frank Freidel in his book Franklin D Roosevelt: A Rendezvous With Destiny (p 195), FDR delivered his State of the Union message to Congress on the evening of 6 January 1936, much to the distaste of Republican opponents. If this is the case, then the article needs to be edited. Gadsby West 16:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

Nancy Pelosi as Speaker

What will the Sergeant-at-Arms call out at the President's entrance for the 2007 SOTU? Surely not, "Mr. Speaker"..... co94 January 6, 2007

Madame Speaker. Just like when a lady President is elected, we will say "Madame President." --Bluejay Young (talk) 01:21, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

See also

I still don't think that the links to the "16 Words" and "Axis of Evil" articles are appropriate here. These would be appropriate in articles about George W. Bush, the war in Iraq, the war on terror, etc., but here, they present a POV problem. Perhaps a section on "Controversies" would solve the problem. I don't want to get into an editing tug-of-war, so I'd like to hear what others think. Mdeaton 23:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

I agree. Having those links here would be like having links to the same articles in the article for President of the United States or even President. I've moved the links to the year-specific articles. I also added one of them to the GWB article which apparently didn't contain it yet. --DachannienTalkContrib 06:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

PAGE IS DEFCON 2 RATED

PAGE IS EXPECTED TO BE vandalsehed. Please make sure page is not! [Recent changes patroler]Dell970 02:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

is this really necessary/notable/sensible? i think not. 84.129.172.67 19:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Standing ovation

This might be a bit off-topic, but one thing that strikes me as odd with every State of the Union Address, is the members of the legislative giving a standing ovation to the executive. But when did this practice start? Did this come about in response to the era of television, or has this been common practice throughout the centuries? AecisBravado 11:44, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Belaboring the obvious

Cut:

  1. The Constitution, however, does not require this information to be given directly to the people, only to Congress, nor is it required to be delivered in the form of a speech.
  2. The practice of speaking on a public broadcast is a tradition that has developed throughout the country's history.

The quote above this, in the intro, speaks for itself. And since public broadcasts began only after the invention of radio, it's obviously a "developed" tradition. --Uncle Ed 19:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Tying the shoe?

I'm having a hard time remembering, here: isn't there a tradition of the President stopping to tie his shoe before entering the chamber to give the speech? Or am I half-remembering something else? I can't seem to find any results for "state of the union"+"shoe" that seem helpful. -_- Kasreyn 08:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

I don't know if there's a tradition, but Bartlet did it before one of his State of the Unions in the tv show The West Wing. --Jessikins (talk) 20:04, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Renaming article

Since the constitution does not require that the state of the union report be in the form of an address, and since the article discusses not only SOTU messages in the form of an address, but also SOTU messages in written form, perhaps this article should be renamed to "State of the Union."Bellczar (talk) 20:01, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

I would say not, as "State of the Union Address" is the commonly used term to describe this event and the times the address has not been delivered orally are noted here as anomalies in the tradition, but still within the terms outlined. I would also add that this article is currently about the "...annual message which the President of the United States gives to Congress, usually an address to a joint session of Congress." I'm fairly certain that means this article is mainly concerned with the addresses given. Buddhasmom 01:35, 23 February 2009 (UTC)

DISinvitation?

Out of sheer curiosity, was any US President NOT invited to give a State of the Union? --Jessikins (talk) 20:05, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

2006 was Bush's 5th SOTU Address

I believe the reference (toward the bottom of the article) to the 2006 SOTU address as Bush's "sixth" is incorrect, it should be "5th." As noted in the article, his address to a joint session of Congress in 2001 (shortly after his 1st inauguration) would not have been called a SOTU Address. See also the subsequent list of all of Bush's SOTU addresses, starting in 2002 (with 2006 being, again, the 5th). 24.7.12.86 (talk) 08:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. For that matter, why is the 2006 SOTU significant enough to be included here as an audio file? It wasn't his final SOTU, nothing really notable took place during that address, or anything along those lines. I recommend removing that particular link; or at least replacing it with a more historically significant SOTU. How about the one FDR gave, outlining the Four Freedoms? --MicahBrwn (talk) 00:20, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
Agreed with the idea of removing it. I don't see any particular significance, and the first 3 mintues are just clapping anyway. Maybe if someone put a montage of audio clip up that would work better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.81.137.234 (talk) 00:45, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Okay, I removed the link to the 2006 SOTU address audio file. I'm all for something along those lines added back, though … but lets make it a notable SOTU. Or, as the above anonymous editor suggested, a montage of notable lines from SOTUs over the years. --MicahBrwn (talk) 07:07, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

Image captions: teleprompter

Both closeup images of the two presidents have captions that mention the teleprompter. Is it necessary to mention that? It gives the impression that whoever wrote that caption is trying to emphasize it as a scripted speech, for whatever reason. ALTON .ıl 10:21, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Remove it if you'd like, but I wouldn't say a mention of the Teleprompter "emphasizes" the scripted nature of the speech. There are Teleprompter stands in front of nearly all political (and other) speeches. It's completely normal. Further, no one thinks it's not a scripted speech. And saying it's scripted is not a slander. It's just a fact. In fact, one would hope the State of the Union speech is prepared in advance. Do you want a President who delivers this important address off the cuff? ask123 (talk) 14:23, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Clinton / Supreme Court

The claim the Supreme Court boycotted Clinton's speech due to the actions leading to his impeachement is sourced to Ann Coulter hardly a neutral commentator. A far better source is needed if such a claim is going to be made or else it should either be removed or rephrased as to a claim of Ann Coulter Nil Einne (talk) 12:57, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

2009 State of the Union?

Why does the "2009" link at the bottom of the article link to Obama's 2/24 speech to Congress? Technically, that wasn't a State of the Union address. Thus, it shouldn't be linked there. ask123 (talk) 14:09, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Tell me about it. I removed it, but some colleague keeps adding it back. --MicahBrwn (talk) 07:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC) The preceding edit has been modified as to the italicized portion (without completely concealing the original version), as a measure in support of our policy of CIV --Jerzy•t 07:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
  • I was abt to add it after reading the earlier part of the accompanying article, but it occurred to me that i'm not the sharpest WP editor, and others probably thot of it earlier, and it'd be be worth checking if there had been any pertinent discussion here first. The initial answer is "Some, but not enuf to decide the question."
    A little research makes it clear that the only benefit is to show the respect that at least the 1st commenter deserves, by explaining why their decision is clearly mistaken.
    The distinction is real enuf for Keith Olbermann to use it as a partisan club to beat a Fixed News figure over not making it, but it is not based in law or common usage. The article's distinction is in fact not the one made by the Congressional Research Service (which is controlled by the Congress; one senator's extract from their current piece on the concept corresponds closely to at least one other report of CRS's EMail on the subject, and i've in turn extracted from the senator's):
Today, the annual State of the Union Message is usually delivered by the President at an evening joint session of Congress during the second, third, or fourth week of January. However, some Presidents have chosen not to deliver a State of the Union Message the year they were inaugurated, or, in some cases, in the January just prior to their departure from office.
The prose portion of the article can use touching up to reflect that better (even tho i don't think even our cruddy version rules out including the most recent address, about which i found in the first page of (whoops, broken quotes!)
Results 1 - 10 of about 12,500 for "State of the Union: 2009 OR obama.
on Google:
The full-dress gathering conferred special weight on the president's words, putting the speech on the level of the annual State of the Union. (SF Chron)
Jan 13, 2009 The 'State of the Union' 2009? The United States Constitution says in Article 2, Section 3: "He [The President] shall from time to time give ... (www.heartlessandbrainless.com/2009/01/state-of-union-2009.html, which is the other site quoting CRS)
State Of The Union 2009: Obama's First Address To Congress Tuesday - The Huffington Post.
The full-dress gathering conferred special weight on the president's words, putting the speech on the level of the annual State of the Union.
State of the Union 2009 ... (www.dmiblog.com/archives/2009/02/state_of_the_union_2009.html)
[last 'graph, from CNN:] Because Obama's presidency is just a month old, the speech is not technically considered a State of the Union address. The annual State of the Union speech is delivered in the House of Representatives before members of both the House and the Senate as well as the justices of the Supreme Court, the president's Cabinet and international dignitaries.
Where to Watch Obama’s "State of the Union" Online NewTeeVee (newteevee.com)
Scaled Down State of the Union 2009 - Associated Content
Feb 24, 2009 ... www.associatedcontent.com/article/1507026/scaled_down_state_of_the_union_2009.html
Obama State Of The Union 2009 | Ready2Beat
Barack Obama will be announcing first State of the Union Address to the American people Tuesday night. Barack Obama will announce first 2009 State of the ... ready2beat.com/current-news/political-news/obama-state-union-2009
State of the Union: Obama's Katrina? ohiogop.blogs.com/state_of_the_union/2009/02/obamas-katrina.html
When 2009 state of the union address? According to the Atlantic Magazine Reporter, Mark Ambinder, the 2009 State of the Union (economic address) will be in early February. Obama's budget is due mid February. wiki.answers.com/Q/When_2009_state_of_the_union_address
The "gotcha" opinion that it's not a real SotUA goes along with the lame ideas that
_ "shall from time to time" constitutes requir[ing] anything and
_ the caps on "State of the Union" in the constitution change it from a specification of what "information" to the official title of the medium that conveys it (any more than "Consideration" is the title of Congressional activity),
and it is far from a basis for removing information from the article that users will expect to find there ... some of them bcz of the lead sent of the article, which uses this funny word "annual", which a series of 17 equally spaced spot checks suggests has gone unchallenged since it was added, in the second edit, around WP's 1st anniversary.
--Jerzy•t 07:22, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

What is and isn't a State of the Union

Instead of spending so much time arguing over the technicality of the 2009 speech's name, I think this article would be greatly improved if it had an extended explanation as to why the first-year addresses are not official STOU. This would be really helpful. Why exactly do first year speeches not count as official STOU? Or do they equally "count", despite a title difference? Has this tradition of not calling it a STOU been around since the STOU term was first used in the 1930s? Has any president since then called his first-year address a STOU? And does officially calling it a STOU or not actually have any real effect (besides creating fun fodder for Wikipedia arguments)? These are all interesting questions I couldn't find answers to in the article. Otebig (talk) 22:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

famous SotU speeches?

Should we add a section to famous State of the Union Speeches? For example, Wilson's 14 Points, and FDR's Four Freedoms? Both of those had international consequence. --Enchanting catalyst (talk) 11:43, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Can this page be locked annually for several days?

Where can I suggest this page be locked to edits by unregistered and new users, annually for several days around the State of the Union address? -auk (talk) 02:51, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Sgt-at-Arms now joined by Majority Floor Services Chief?

The last two State of the Unions I have seen, the Majority Floor Services Chief (Barry Sullivan) came out with the House Sgt.-at-Arms (Wilson Leavengood) and they did the "Madame Speaker -- The President of the United States" thing together. Why did they start doing it that way? I have been watching these things since they've been televised and it's always been the Sgt.-at-Arms by himself, while the Floor Svcs. Chief announces the Vice Pres. & members of the Senate. --Bluejay Young (talk) 01:28, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Move back

Ambiguity

Can somebody please clarify if "State of the Union", means "condition of the union" or if it is referring to the US as a sovereign state? I can't be the only person to be confused by this, and it doesn't seem to be stated in the article. 82.132.139.148 (talk) 10:23, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

Intro paragraph says "condition". Infoman99 (talk) 03:35, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Question on number of seats for observers with invitation

I attended the 1988 State of the Union address by Ronald Regan. I always wondered how many invitations are given out to the Attendies who sit in the upper level of the chamber. I also wondered if I can get a copy of the invitation. The original invitation was destroyed by super storm Sandy,this past October. Any response is greatly appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.84.250.100 (talk • contribs) 03:50, 21 January 2013‎

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:45, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

State of the Union address → State of the Union – Per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:CONCISE, this speech is typically referred to as simply the "State of the Union," as seen in the lede of the article now. "State of the Union address" works in prose, but not as good a fit for our naming WP:CRITERIA. BDD (talk) 20:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on State of the Union. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:05, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Network coverage

I changed the lede from "most networks" carrying the SOTU to "many networks." About 7-10 will carry it, and there are scores of networks, so saying "most" would be inaccurate. CsikosLo (talk) 14:46, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

protocol

The section on protocol is referenced by footnotes 20 and 21, which are respectively a transcript of a SOTU and a volume of Congressional Records. Neither is a source for protocol, but simply describes what happened. In particular, does protocol require "Mister" Speaker, when there has been a female speaker? And does protocol require the phrase "First Lady" when the possibility exists of a male spouse of a President? If not, then this is presented wrongly - if so, then a source would be great. --Richardson mcphillips (talk) 23:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

This years state of the union was also carried on the One America News channel

I watched the state of the union on One America News — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.137.138.226 (talk) 05:47, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

How Accurate Are the 2018 TV Ratings?

I am wondering how accurate the TV ratings for the 2018 speech were. This was Donald Trump's first State of the Union, but we are supposed to believe that his ratings failed to smash any records. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 14:06, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

TV ratings - suggested change for readability

Currently, the table under "TV ratings" includes a "Networks" column that is just a long list of TV channels that carried the speech, which is sometimes - but not always - alphabetized within each cell. I wonder if it might be more readable to have columns for each network and then a checkmark for which ones carried the speech in a given year. It would certainly be easier to compare coverage over time, it would force each year to show networks in the same order, and it would likely not make any given year any less readable than it is now. But I thought I would solicit feedback here and see if others agree.

So the header row might look something like this:

Date President Viewers,

millions

Households,

millions

Rating Network Coverage
ABC CBS FOX NBC PBS CNN FOXNC MSNBC FOX BUSINESS ESTRELLA TELEMUNDO UNIVISION

(It might also make sense to wiki-link to the network abbreviations for clarity--I included one example of that above.) Thoughts?

In any case, I think the "TV ratings" heading should be changed to "TV ratings and coverage" since it includes both. --EightYearBreak (talk) 15:35, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Delivery of the speech

This section should be changed to read: "It is customary for the Speaker of the House to send a formal invitation to the President several weeks before each State of the Union Address.[17][18]" The only Constitutional requirement for the SOTU address is that it be given TO Congress (both Senate AND House) and there is no requirement for the method or location of delivery. Giving it at the House is a tradition, not a requirement Angelor2000 (talk) 21:31, 23 January 2019 (UTC)angelor 1/23/2019

This article is largely describing the traditions of the SOTU address, and this is made clear in the Formality section. It would be tiresome to prefix every sentence with "Customarily,". Wikishelt (talk) 03:48, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Usual Wilipedia liberal bias

How come there is no photo of the current President? --2600:6C65:747F:CD3F:D801:CBDE:66A9:1672 (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

Obamas first SOTU

why include Trumps informal 1st address but not Obamas? Surely there are ratings available (February 2009 Barack Obama speech to joint session of Congress) jonas (talk) 07:42, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

No reason to include the Trump one either - this isn't a list of "almost SOTU"s. I removed it. ItsDrewMiller (talk) 23:29, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

If anyone does want to add a section on the pseudo-SOTUs that Presidents tend to give in their first year, https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-joint-session-of-congress-2017-not-state-of-the-union/ seems like a decent source that has info and references going back to Reagan. ItsDrewMiller (talk) 23:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC)

Definition of 'Union' in this context needed

For English-understanding people, even fluent and educated ones outside of USA is not self-evident that 'Union' means here United States (of America). Added confusion by ambiguitity of word 'state' does not help. I suggest little addendum in form of formal definiton - or simple clarifications in lines of: 'Union here means United States of America, as stated (bad... formulated? worded?...) in Constitution of same' in head paragraph of the article. You remember, that English is understood by some billion people in the world and good part of them use English Wikipedia? :) BirgittaMTh (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Inaugural-year addresses

It is surely a fact that speeches delivered by newly elected presidents are not described by most news organizations or the presidents themselves as "State of the Union" speeches, and likewise, it's true that news organizations seem to remind us of that fact every time the issue comes up. But it's wrong for the article to say 'Newly inaugurated presidents generally deliver an address to Congress in February of the first year of their term, but this speech is not officially considered to be a "State of the Union".' In fact, there is no "official" source to define this term, and the Congressional Research Service document cited in support for that sentence [4] consistently does call these speeches "State of the Union" speeches, as in this extract:

First Year Addresses
In an “inaugural” State of the Union address, Presidents attempt to set the tone for a new Administration. Most of the rhetoric contained in early term speeches is forward-looking. In their first address, Presidents take positions on numerous policy issues in an attempt to direct the legislative agenda for the next four years. Since 1965, the average number of policy requests in a first year State of the Union address is 42.

Furthermore, Presidents Eisenhower and Kennedy both called their inaugural addresses State of the Union speeches, and as this NPR article points out [5] they were certainly within their rights to do so. It also posits a more useful explanation for why recent presidents have not called their inaugural speeches State of the Union addresses: they have been more prescriptive than descriptive.

So that sentence needs to be changed. I suggest '...but recent inaugural addresses have focused on policy directions rather than "information of the State of the Union."' 67.188.1.213 (talk) 23:23, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Requested move 5 November 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved (closed by non-admin page mover) Calidum 16:12, 19 November 2021 (UTC)


State of the Union → State of the Union Address – The official name for the annual message given by the POTUS to the Congress is "State of the Union Address", not "State of the Union". Mechanical Keyboarder (talk) 03:57, 5 November 2021 (UTC) — Relisting. VR talk 23:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

This is a contested technical request (permalink).  — Amakuru (talk) 17:29, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:State_of_the_Union/Archive_1&oldid=1140197093"