Talk:St Padarn's Church, Llanbadarn Fawr

St Padarn's Church, Llanbadarn Fawr received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wales Mid‑importance

	Wales portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Ncox (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article.

comment

I've extensively rewritten this article, using original research (by which as I explain later, I've used secondary sources that weren't referred to previously), where possible - I am curate at this church, so it is in my jurisdiction, as it were.Ncox (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Original research

The article itself specifies that it includes original research. There are also a number of weasel words, such as "It is possibly the second most important church," and uncited areas.

I have added a declaration of interest box for Noel Cox, and some citation needed tags... I'm going to look at some other content now, as this is the second article of Noel's that I've tagged, and I don't want to give the impression that I'm following one particular person! 86.181.149.124 (talk) 19:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have added in-line citations. There is no original research in the Wikipedia sense, I simply meant that I had drawn together a number of disparate secondary sources, some of what hadn't been used for the history of this church. I do have an interest in the church as I work there, but I think you will find that the article is fully reference and does not have anything that could be said to be inaccurate, contentious or otherwise inappropriate.Ncox (talk) 12:03, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would be grateful for an explanation of how this page can be "rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale".Ncox (talk) 16:11, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ncox: I've upgraded this to A-class. I think you should consider nominating it for Peer Review (I would be happy to do the reviewing) and later for Featured status. Ham II (talk) 06:27, 13 June 2015 (UTC) Thank you. I have requested a review as you suggestedNcox (talk) 15:27, 13 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St Padarn's Church, Llanbadarn Fawr. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20121224151528/http://www.npor.org.uk/cgi-bin/ESearch.cgi?Fn=Esearch&firm=800 to http://www.npor.org.uk/cgi-bin/ESearch.cgi?Fn=Esearch&firm=800

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:47, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

St Padarn, a painting by Tom Equels, 2015, in the Lady Chapel.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]