Talk:St John's Cathedral (Brisbane)

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	St John's Cathedral (Brisbane) is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland Mid‑importance

	Australia portal St John's Cathedral (Brisbane) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A Decent Photo Please

Can someone take a good photo of the exterior, preferably from an ecclesiastical southwest perspective? Can't do it myself since I live abroad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.170.226.91 (talk • contribs) 05:29, 18 November 2007

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St John's Cathedral (Brisbane). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130410023520/http://anglicanarchives.org.au/HDMS-HTML/HAMIS063.htm to http://www.anglicanarchives.org.au/hdms-html/HAMIS063.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:37, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re-use of stone intended for Holy Name Cathedral

The sentence "Some other stone, which had been quarried for the abandoned project to build the Holy Name Cathedral was also purchased" has been flagged as "citation needed". After a fairly diligent search, I failed to find anything online but the time period this re-use would have occurred in would be after the end of the out-of-copyright newspapers (1954) and before the advent of the WWW, so not a great period for finding online citations. But I removed it because it is somewhat implausible. Everything written about the Holy Name Cathedral, Brisbane states that Duhig needed so much stone for this massive edifice that he intended to construct it from a manufactured stone called Benedict stone and needed so much of it that he obtained a licence to manufacture it locally. It was made from a mixture of cement and crushed Brisbane tuff (aka prophry). The early work that preceded this was the foundations which were made from Brisbane tuff (a common practice in Brisbane at that time). Unlike the third phase of St John's, the period of construction (or attempted construction) of the Holy Name Cathedral was within the time period of the online historic newspapers (1954 or earlier) and there is no mention of the use of Helidon sandstone in connection with the Holy Name Cathedral other than to point out it was using manufactured stone instead. So in the absence of any evidence that the Holy Name was going to use Helidon sandstone at all, it seems unlikely there was any left-over for use on St John's Cathedral. But, if anyone can find a reliable citation that supports the claim, please add it. Kerry (talk) 02:11, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]