Talk:St George's Tron Church

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tron

A tron is a (medieval) public balance or steelyard operated by a local authority and usually set adjacent to the marketplace. There's still one standing in Stenton, East Lothian.

My Scots dictionary defines tron as "marketplace", so I guess it means the church in the marketplace. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 22:41, September 11, 2005 (UTC)

POV

Wikipedia is supposed to stay completely neutral regarding faiths. I think that referring in the article to "the life-changing word of God" may be breaching that impartiality. 22:36, Mai 14, 2007

You are quite right. I'm sorry it has been a year and a half since your post. But I have removed that. --Doric Loon (talk) 17:25, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anglican

I've removed the reference to Anglicanism in the above box. This a congregation of the Church of Scotland (i.e. Presbyterian not Anglican). --Drumhollistan (talk) 18:06, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

People make that mistake all the time with the Church of Scotland. Where it gets confusing is the Church of Scotland bishops from the 17th century. Anglican or not? Keep up the good work. -- Secisek (talk) 20:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Secession

I've removed one of the presbytery objectives from the list given. All of them need a citation, but the third in particular is a POV-statement that could be potentially harmful to the congregation of SGT. It implies that the congregation there is not the same legal entity as it was before, which is currently disputed. As this could have serious implications for the future of the congregation, it cannot stand uncited.

The original three objectives read as follows:

1. To support any members who wish to remain in the denomination. 2. To maintain a Church of Scotland presence in the Parish, and to provide funeral cover to the 5000-strong Parish (although the Tron argues this is unnecessary). 3. To maintain the legal entity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Konirm10 (talk • contribs) 08:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Split into two articles - one on building; one on congregation?

Hi all, I wonder where the content about the congregation is now going. They can't really stay in this article since it is about the building-congregation combination that they no longer belong to. I would have thought them notable enough to justify an article? Grateful for any suggestions. Springnuts (talk) 21:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Departure of not just the minister

I have altered some editing which spoke of the departure of the minister as if only he had left. But it is pretty clear from press coverage and the C of S press release that the entire congregation have gone. Springnuts (talk) 21:33, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some extra bits from the press coverage of the dispute, although the rights and wrongs of this would probably best be left out. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.147.173.242 (talk) 12:17, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think they've all gone - I understand a rump congregation still worships in the building unter the interim moderator. --Doric Loon (talk) 11:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As I understand from the press coverage and the press release by the CofS itself, they did all go. It's been 6 months, of course, and it may be that the church has managed to attract a few people since then.

I've just seen that someone -- presumably a press officer for the Church of Scotland -- using a single-purpose account did a whitewash on the article, carefully removing all the stuff that made the headlines (i.e. was most notable). I've reported it to WP:ANI, although I don't know whether this will do much good. Worth being aware that someone is trying to hide the facts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.151.115.17 (talk) 20:32, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss major changes here first

I've just rolled back a series of edits that gave no explanation in the edit summary and reduced the total article references (from WP:RP sources such as the BBC) from 8 to 3. Major changes should be discussed here first, whenever possible, and even single edits that remove reliable sources should be explained, and/or, preferably, be countered in the article text with a rebuttal from another reliable source, rather than completely removed. AnonNep (talk) 18:06, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The same editor has whitewashed the page again, and I am minded to return to good. -Roxy the dog™ (resonate) 10:46, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding those references: two are dead links and one appears to be a blog. Jonathunder (talk) 22:16, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These are the BBC refs that keep being removed - ^[1]^[2] AnonNep (talk) 14:45, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ "Charity regulator called into St George's Tron Kirk row". BBC. 2012-12-11. Retrieved 2013-10-29.
^ "St George's Tron congregation leaves over gay rights". BBC. 2012-12-09. Retrieved 2013-10-29.

Suggestion: remove the second external link to "The Tron Church", the new site of the departed congregation. Surely irrelevant as per WP:ELNO, as it does not pertain to the subject of the article? Lonestarsteve (talk) 15:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Done. (NB. Edit Summary from action by way of explanation - "Removing link to congregation that no longer meets here (as per Talk page suggestion). Article is focused on history/activity at this location not former congregations/groups.") AnonNep (talk) 19:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on St George's Tron Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:48, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on St George's Tron Church. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130815114551/http://www.churchofscotland.org.uk/news_and_events/news/articles/statement_on_st_georges_tron to http://www.churchofscotland.org.uk/news_and_events/news/articles/statement_on_st_georges_tron

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:27, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[1] "Charity regulator called into St George's Tron Kirk row". BBC. 2012-12-11. Retrieved 2013-10-29.

[2] "St George's Tron congregation leaves over gay rights". BBC. 2012-12-09. Retrieved 2013-10-29.

[1]

[2]