Jump to content

Talk:St Eunan's College

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Individual Staff Members

[edit]

This page should not include any information that wouldn't be found in a standard enclyclopedia entry on the subject. Naming individual members of staff is meaningless to anyone not associated with the school, and it violates Wikipedia:Vanity guidelines. The same goes for students, past or present, unless they've done anything sufficiently noteworthy! Pathlessdesert 12:00, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Word. Jobjörn (Talk | contribs) 13:09, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I think the whole article is someones vanity page. Djegan 20:22, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Should we request a deletion for it or let it be? Jobjörn (Talk | contribs) 00:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think its borderline afd. Djegan 18:51, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
And so the question remains: should we or should we not? ;) It'd probably fail, though. Jobjörn (Talk | contribs) 02:14, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It probably would fail. Let it alone, I say. Pathlessdesert 14:03, 18 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

(Removed remarks made by me earlier, meant largely as a joke, but uncivil in tone). Pathlessdesert 21:32, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Building Problems

[edit]

This is the truth. It is not a hoax. I would not waste my time being a vandal. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheBigDirtyBastard (talk • contribs) .

How about sticking to a single account when you edit? I like your new username better than the others. The "Number of Toilets: 4 (2 currently out of operation)" edit is pure comedy genius. Pathlessdesert 17:21, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So, exactly what of that section is incorrect? Tagging it with a "hoax" tag unfortunately puts it in the suspected hoaxes category, which contains alot of very disreputable articels, and may cause trouble. It may be worth it to just do some redaction. 68.39.174.238 17:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't think there is anything wrong with the Building Problems section.--PinkPaper 18:29, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea whether it is a hoax or not. I see it as yet another banal and inconsequential addition to this pig's breakfast of a vanity article, likely to be of interest to nobody outside of the college itself. Pathlessdesert 19:28, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The way I see it is that with such uncertainty as to whether it is a hoax or not perhaps it would be unwise as yet to campaign against its inclusion on this site. There are after all many more dubious pages under construction by more unscrupulous vandals elsewhere than those who are maintaining this one. As far as I can see it appears to give a reasonably detailed account of the school.

As a person who spends a considerable amount of my life there the disputed paragraph is accurate and I'm sure the other thousand people who are employed or study there would agree. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.42.18.62 (talk • contribs) 20:06, 18 November 2006.
Like I already said, Candelwicke/Together&Forever/TheBigDirtyBastard/86.42.18.62 (these are just some of the names you post under), how about using a single account to post your edits? It is considered bad form to use so many accounts. Pathlessdesert 21:15, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK--TheBigDirtyBastard 21:24, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I am not trying to put you off from editing this page or any other. I just think that you should be transparent about what you've been doing! Pathlessdesert 21:27, 18 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Going to remove the thing above Building Problems because the article is sourced--86.42.53.119 16:18, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The do back up. I think I--86.42.53.119 16:25, 19 November 2006 (UTC) will delete it.[reply]

Sorry but why should i be blocked. maybe You should be blocked . Your no better than me . ive played my part you've played yours. Don't talk —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.42.53.119 (talk • contribs) 16:50, 19 November 2006.

Excuse me for interrupting this disagreement but I did hear this mentioned on a local radio station earlier in the week. --PinkPaper 20:30, 19 November 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.53.119 (talk • contribs) [reply]

Very sarcastic, aren't you? Do you have a life offline at all? Perhaps you take great joy from harrassing ordinary decent people and taking advantage of their attempts to make the world a better place. It would appear as though you have nothing better to do than to criticise the efforts of others who are working hard to make this project better. Unlike you, a lot of people have limited time to take part in this and I'm sure you've probably discouraged many genuine people from continuing to waste their time trying to reason with you. I wonder have you ever made a mistake at all, you seem like someone who knows everything. That isn't directly from the Dept. of Education, it is a reference to a report that was written. Isn't that what this article requires, a reference, a source? Which is exactly what it is. --Milkman Go Home 20:53, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But I have not lied. I changed my account because Wikipedia asked me to. It found the names offensive. I'm only trying to help with the information. If my attempts are not valued, it isn't really worth my time. Would you rather I left? You seem to be the only one bothered by my existence. Maybe you would rather I had never been born? --Milkman Go Home 21:14, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • First there was no source [1] then the source was a school annual [2], then it was a county council report, then it was the Department of Education report which was researched and published (on a freewebs.com site, naturally) in less than a week since the incident supposedly happened. Stop telling lies. Demiurge 21:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced and non-notable content

[edit]

This page contains some useful information and the school is notable. However, there are plenty of unsourced claims which cannot be verified. These will be removed. The page also contains large quantities of non-notable informaton such as alumni without the notability to have wikipedia entries (red links), 15 photographs of the schools and its rooms, a list of non-notable past presidents, mention that the school has a library that contains Time magazine, details of school trips.

Although at least half of the content of this page should be removed, I disagree with part of the above. Alumni that are notable enough to be worth an article should be listed and redlinked--that's part of what builds the project in general, right? Somebody may be prompted by the link to go and add the article. "Notable alumni" should also include people that are "notable" in some meaningful (and verifiable) way, even if there is not enough information to justify an article. I don't know anything about Irish football, so I'm not making any guesses about the footballers, but the "artist" (who decorates children's bedrooms with characters created by Disney and others[3]) and the priest (whose short obituary reveals an admirable but unexceptional career, with no information except his parish postings) don't seem to be likely topics of articles. I think that it's up to neutral Irish editors to decide whether they should be removed--I'm just going to de-link them. --Hjal 18:32, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed Curtains99 23:50, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All of this spurious and non-notable text and images will be removed, leaving a much shorter but more encyclopaedic article. Even the school crest has been ripped from a website and intentionally mislabeled as the contributor's own work. (This image can probably stay, as it counts as a fair use logo). I am sorry if this upsets the contributor of this article, but wikipedia will be devalued if readers have to wade through huge quantities of information that is neither notable nor sourced to find out about a subject. Please improve Wikipedia which I'm sure you can do if you put your mind to it. Curtains99 18:01, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As promised, the unsourced and non-notable material has been largely removed. Here are some suggestions for how to improve the article:
  • Create wiki pages for those alumni with red links: inter-county footballers etc.
  • Get a better photo of the school. The one remaining photo is very dark (try to get the sun behind you).
  • Use the Template:IrishSchoolInfoBox to lay out the basic information about the school
  • Get a proper logo for the school (maybe scan one) rather than the image that has been ripped from the school web site with whoosh lines
  • Get a source for 'The college is now also the number one athletics and basketball school in the county' so that this doesn't have to be deleted.

Curtains99 13:01, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The information is relevant. Please do not vandalize any further or you will be blocked. --DevelopedMadness 18:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to be mean but I will treat you the same way you treat me.--DevelopedMadness 18:09, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All content submitted to Wikipedia must be verifiable. You will see this at the bottom of the edit box whenever you edit a page. Verifiability is a Wikipedia policy. An explanation of verifiability is provided here: WP:V Note particularly this part of the policy:

Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reliable source, or it may be challenged or removed by any editor

If this is confusing for you feel free to ask a question and someone will answer. Curtains99 20:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Good to see this page being knocked into shape! Pathlessdesert 23:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Well it's better but it still reads like a child's project. Boasting that your school has a library with Time magazine and a wheelchair ramp is like boasting that your kitchen is equipped with a kettle and a sink. I don't think the student who is tirelessly defending these unremarkable assertions understands that the school's reputation is diminished as a result. Curtains99 00:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

So the St. Eunan's official site is a source?

[edit]

Really? That counts as a source? For the "building" of the new extension, its validity should be trusted by a link to the official site of the school?

Can I add that I was the greatest ever student of the college, link to my "weblog" as a source, and claim that what I say is true? Because, after all, I have linked documentation to back up what I say. Isn't this how idiots "footnote" their "books"?

This is ridiculous. Who is responsible for this entry?

) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dwayneshintzy (talk • contribs) 03:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

The college is the number 1 basketball school in the country?!?!

[edit]

What...is this supposed to be a proper, informed article on St. Eunan's College, or a stupidly hysterical "piece" on how amazing it is?

What, are we also the best American football side in Ireland? Maybe we have provided the most professional "people from Letterkenny" in the country? Aren't we the only ones to do that.

I don't find this page embarrassing. Just amazingly idiotic....though it's hilarity has amused me, I must say. Bravo.

Is that the point? Is the point of the page to enetrtain past pupils by its ridiculous assertions? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dwayneshintzy (talk • contribs) 03:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

You are probably right. Why not have a go at improving the article? Pathlessdesert 18:56, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete

[edit]

do not delete--87.36.19.19 09:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

absurd

[edit]

I've just finished my secondary level education at this school and I can safely say that this article is a HUGE VANITY PAGE!!

It fails to mention that the facilties are in an appalling condition. The heating rarely works in winter. At the start of the year, plaster collapsed from the first floor ceiling. The place is a dump.

Sport is the ONLY THING THIS SCHOOL SUCCEEDS IN! In terms of academics, St. Eunans is an awful state. Most of the people I know who went there went on to waste their talents and their lives. The curriculum has been handicapped by underfunding for years.

Despite what this article says, THIS SCHOOL DOES NOT GIVE IT'S STUDENTS A MODERN EDUCATION.

IT'S ALL A PACK OF LIES!!

The quality of this article says a lot about the quality of the school. They were once visited by a golfer and they hold quizzes. 192.122.221.55 01:52, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's going on here?

[edit]

This page appears to be a reprint of information found solely on the college web site or in the minds of students. Please take a look at WP:V for Wikipedia's policy that information added must be verifiable. The source for nearly the entire content of this page is the college's own website. This is a self-published source. Per WP:V, self publisghed sources may be used for information about themselves so long as

  • it is relevant to their notability
  • the article is not based primarily on such sources

I'm afraid that this article fails on both counts. I'd like to see the whole content removed bar anything that distinguishes the school from other schools.

Comments? BoxOfNeedles 17:16, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Eunanslogo.jpg

[edit]

Image:Eunanslogo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The galleries in this article do not appear to meet the guidelines at WP:IG and so were removed. They have been restored with a claim that the removal was bad faith. What is the purpose of them? The pictures of nondescript classrooms seems particularly pointless and the other images of various non notable parts of the school do not seem to add any value. noq (talk) 18:14, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 17 external links on Saint Eunan's College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:44, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saint Eunan's College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:54, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 August 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved  — Amakuru (talk) 07:00, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Saint Eunan's College → St Eunan's College – Over redirect. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Punctuation and spacing. The "St." form is preferred in American English, while the "St" form is used on the other side of the Atlantic (or, as that policy indicates, "Dr." and "Dr"). Most of those listed in Category:Girls' schools in the Republic of Ireland, Category:Boys' schools in the Republic of Ireland, etc. use the form "St X School". Ireland's Department of Education uses the form "St Eunan's College" in its inspection reports, as do local sources such as this, this and this. 2001:BB6:A93:FE58:9CE7:4466:26D7:E125 (talk) 00:06, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:St_Eunan%27s_College&oldid=1200049142"