Talk:St Cyprian's Cathedral, Kimberley

South Africa Low‑importance

	South Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anglicanism Low‑importance

	St Cyprian's Cathedral, Kimberley is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Discussion on source of material including overlap with text in another website

Hello, St Cyprian's Cathedral, Kimberley. You have new messages at Dodger67's talk page.
Message added 10:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Roger (talk) 10:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I have discovered that the article has a very serious problem. A lot of the text has been copied directly from http://stcyprians.itgo.com/ - such a copyright violation is in fact illegal and must be removed as soon as possible. Roger (talk) 12:24, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would you advise? - I am author of both - so it is not copyright violation, even if it appears so.Blarcrean (talk) 13:01, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your being the original author does not solve the issue. Are you the owner of the stcyprians.itgo.com site? Copyright by default belongs to the website owner unless it is specified otherwise. I will make enquiries about how to fix the problem and get back to you asap. Roger (talk) 13:27, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I am the originator and owner of the website.Blarcrean (talk) 13:29, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In that case WP:IOWN is where you'll find the solution. Roger (talk) 18:22, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this. I have noted now on the http://stcyprians.itgo.com/ site that I am the author of that material and also that my photo of the cathedral taken in Sept 2005 which appears there and in the Wikipedia article has been made available through wikimedia. On my question below, may I remove the notice concerning citations? Blarcrean (talk) 20:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Roger, would you consider the citations for the article in question sufficient now? I have attended to some of the matters of style as well (I think this was about the second wikipedia contribution I made as a novice nearly four years ago). There is also in fact fairly limited overlap between the material here and that which I wrote at http://stcyprians.itgo.com/ All the best Blarcrean (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]