Talk:St. Raphael Provincial Park

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.

Wikipedians in Ontario may be able to help!

The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

A fact from St. Raphael Provincial Park appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 April 2023, and was viewed approximately 2,543 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the St. Raphael Provincial Park in Northern Ontario, Canada, is part of the 1,530 km² (590 sq mi) St. Raphael Signature Site, which is recognized for its natural and recreational values?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/April. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/St. Raphael Provincial Park.

Wikipedia

Canada: Ontario / Geography Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.

Protected areas Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 22:48, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the St. Raphael Provincial Park in northern Ontario, Canada, is part of the 1,530 square kilometres (590 sq mi) St. Raphael Signature Site, which is recognized for its natural and recreational values? Source: Ref #6: "The Signature Site encompasses more than 153,000 hectares of remote landscape and is comprised of St. Raphael Provincial Park and..."
Ref #3: "...the St. Raphael Signature Site, one of 9 such areas featured in the Ontario’s Living Legacy Land Use Strategy (1999). Signature Sites are identified for their range of natural and recreational values and their potential to contribute to future recreation and tourism."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Tiakur

Created by P199 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:36, 27 March 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/St. Raphael Provincial Park; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

Article is long enough and new enough; no sourcing, copyright, or content issues were found. Hook has good source and meets length and format criterion. QPQ was done.--Orygun (talk) 18:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@P199 and Orygun: Your hook is 205 characters, but we do not allow hooks longer than 200. Bruxton (talk) 22:22, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bruxton: Oops, I never bothered to check (it didn't seem too long...). What about:

ALT0a: * ... that the St. Raphael Provincial Park in northern Ontario, Canada, is part of the 1,530 km² (590 sq mi) St. Raphael Signature Site, which is recognized for its natural and recreational values?

-- P 1 9 9 ✉ 22:31, 30 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Must have left "that" out of my original hook character count. Hook now under 200. Should be good to go.--Orygun (talk) 20:04, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]