Talk:St Nicolas Church, Pevensey

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sussex Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Christianity: Anglicanism Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Anglicanism (assessed as Low-importance).

Copyright check

I just wanted to note that I had an exchange with the original author of this article in VRTS ticket # 2012081510004127, where they claimed the work was based on many sources and original in its presentation. Although they included no references for lack of time, they hope others will be able to help with this. Dcoetzee 16:06, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I will pick this up after the weekend. I have access to numerous sources, and the article has actually been on my "to-do" list for some time. A cursory look suggests to me that most of the material can be easily referenced using the stuff I have to hand. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 16:26, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, I'm not the original author referred to above; I was alerted to it by links to the article being placed by Dcoetzee on other articles on my watch list. Hassocks5489 (Floreat Hova!) 16:33, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]