This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Egyptological subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ancient EgyptWikipedia:WikiProject Ancient EgyptTemplate:WikiProject Ancient EgyptAncient Egypt articles
We should have an article on every pyramid and every nome in Ancient Egypt. I'm sure the rest of us can think of other articles we should have.
Cleanup.
To start with, most of the general history articles badly need attention. And I'm told that at least some of the dynasty articles need work. Any other candidates?
Standardize the Chronology.
A boring task, but the benefit of doing it is that you can set the dates !(e.g., why say Khufu lived 2589-2566? As long as you keep the length of his reign correct, or cite a respected source, you can date it 2590-2567 or 2585-2563)
Stub sorting
Anyone? I consider this probably the most unimportant of tasks on Wikipedia, but if you believe it needs to be done . . .
Data sorting.
This is a project I'd like to take on some day, & could be applied to more of Wikipedia than just Ancient Egypt. Take one of the standard authorities of history or culture -- Herotodus, the Elder Pliny, the writings of Breasted or Kenneth Kitchen, & see if you can't smoothly merge quotations or information into relevant articles. Probably a good exercise for someone who owns one of those impressive texts, yet can't get access to a research library.
Since this is the article on the geographical site, shouldn't it include the original Egyptian name? I figured since its not anywhere else on Wikipedia, it would be here. -- 142.161.97.193 (talk) 06:42, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WHEN WAS IT BUILT??????????????
MORE INFO PLEASE! SOMEONE FORGOT TO ADD THE IMPORTANT DETAILS FORE GETTING TO THE NITTY GRITTY GENERALITIES. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.131.121.133 (talk) 03:46, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The introduction mentions: "There are two temples here, both of which are dedicated to Pakhet." There is no further mention of the 2nd temple. I assume the 2nd temple isn't the one on the site of Hatshepsut's temple : "An earlier temple was probably located [at Hatshepsut's temple], but no traces older than that of Hatshepsut have been found". Aarghdvaark (talk) 11:18, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]