Talk:Spencer Ackerman
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Spencer Ackerman article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 years |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
COI tag (August 2021)
[edit]Unaddressed COI from WP:SPA Loksmythe (talk) 13:47, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Loksmythe, is there something beyond what you addressed with the editor on their talk page? Innisfree987 (talk) 14:57, 16 August 2021 (UTC)
- Innisfree987, WP:DUCK in my opinion. WP:SPA engaged in WP:PROMO who clearly has previous editing experience. Loksmythe (talk) 01:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Loksmythe, for me the thing is you asked and got an answer. I sort of think, if you feel it’s past what you can accept AGF, it belongs at WP:COIN to get a consensus on how to handle. Here it seems just reiterating concerns already asked and answered. Innisfree987 (talk) 02:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Tag still appropriate IMO. This article is really heavy on the primary sourced promotion - David Gerard (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree now: the issues were not addressed unfortunately. Innisfree987 (talk) 17:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- If anyone else has time to pitch in cutting it back, I’d be grateful. It was 112kb when I started and it’s down by half but still far too detailed. Fresh eyes would be very welcome. Innisfree987 (talk) 21:38, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah I agree now: the issues were not addressed unfortunately. Innisfree987 (talk) 17:27, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Tag still appropriate IMO. This article is really heavy on the primary sourced promotion - David Gerard (talk) 12:57, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
- Loksmythe, for me the thing is you asked and got an answer. I sort of think, if you feel it’s past what you can accept AGF, it belongs at WP:COIN to get a consensus on how to handle. Here it seems just reiterating concerns already asked and answered. Innisfree987 (talk) 02:58, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
- Innisfree987, WP:DUCK in my opinion. WP:SPA engaged in WP:PROMO who clearly has previous editing experience. Loksmythe (talk) 01:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
Categories:
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles